ArticleMedical engineering & physics2024
Finite element investigation of the influence of a new transpedicular vertebral implant positioning on biomechanical responses of the spine segment.
Article in Medical engineering & physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of scoliosis severity on thoracolumbar biomechanical properties: a finite element analysis-based study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Effect of cement volume on biomechanical response of a spine segment treated with a PEEK polymer implant: a finite element comparative study with vertebroplasty.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The optimal positioning of an implant into a living organ such as femurs and vertebra is still an open problem. In particular, vertebral implant position has a significant impact on the results on spine behaviour after treatment in terms of stiffness, range of motion (ROM), wear, loosening and failure. In the current work, a 3D finite element analysis was conducted to investigate the positioning parameters of a novel transpedicular implant (V-STRUT©, Hyprevention, France) in terms of placement of the implant in the treated vertebra. The implant was designed in order to strength osteoporotic vertebral body and the related spine segment under compressive load. The effects of the axial and sagittal positions of the implant in the treated vertebra was investigated in terms of stress and stiffness variations. A 3D finite element model of an osteoporotic spine segment was built based on a Computed Tomography (CT) scan of an osteoporotic female (69 yo). The model is composed of T12, L1 and L2 vertebrae and corresponding intervertebral discs and ligaments. The bone tissue was modeled as a heterogeneous material with properties assigned based on the grey scale levels. The intervertebral discs were modeled using two regions describing the annulus and the nucleus and linear beam elements with specific stiffness each were used representing each ligament. The simulations indicated that the sagittal position (distance d) plays a role on the stress distribution. The closer the implant to the interior wall the lower the stress applied to the spine segment. Nevertheless, the axial plane position (distance h) have limited effects on the stress applied to the bone with a higher stress applied to the device (subjected to a higher bending load). These results can have direct clinical implications when dealing with the optimal placement of the implant. It is also possible to select a particular position in order to assign a given (target) stiffness for a patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.