ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2024
Geospatial Disparities in Youth Sexually Transmitted Infections During COVID-19.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of the Child Opportunity Index in Adolescent and Young Adult Health Research.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026Article
- Chlamydia and gonorrhea incidence and residential segregation: US spatiotemporal patterns (2013-2021).BMC public health · 2025Article
- Ethnic disparities in prevalence and screening rates of sexually transmitted infections.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEarly in the COVID-19 pandemic, routine sexually transmitted infection (STI) screenings decreased, and test positivity rates increased due to limited screening appointments, national-level STI testing supply shortages, and social distancing mandates. It is unclear if adolescent preventive STI screening has returned to pre-pandemic levels and if pre-existing disparities worsened in late-pandemic.
methodsThis cross-sectional study examined 22,974 primary care visits by 13-19-year-olds in the Philadelphia metropolitan area undergoing screening for gonorrhea and chlamydia in a 31-clinic pediatric primary care network during 2018-2022. Using interrupted-time-series analysis and logistic regression, pandemic-related changes in the asymptomatic STI screening rate and test positivity were tracked across patient demographics. Neighborhood moderation was investigated by census-tract-level Child Opportunity Index in 2023.
resultsThe asymptomatic STI screening rate dropped by 27.8 percentage points (pp) and 13.5pp when the pandemic and national STI test supply shortage began, respectively, but returned to pre-pandemic levels after supply availability was restored in early 2021. Non-Hispanic-Black adolescents had a significant pandemic drop in STI screening rate, and it did not return to prep-andemic levels (-3.6 pp in the late-pandemic period, p<0.01). This decrease was more pronounced in socioeconomically and educationally disadvantaged neighborhoods (7.5 pp and 9.9 pp lower, respectively) than in advantaged neighborhoods (both p<0.001), controlling for sex, age, insurance type and clinic characteristics.
conclusionsNeighborhood socioeconomic and educational disadvantage amplified racial-ethnic disparities in STI screening during the pandemic. Future interventions should focus on improving primary care utilization of non-Hispanic-Black adolescents to increase routine STI screening and preventive care utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.