Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38417538›Full record

ArticleFood and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association2024

Advancing botanical safety: A strategy for selecting, sourcing, and characterizing botanicals for developing toxicological tools.

Suramya Waidyanatha, Bradley J Collins, Tim Cristy, Michelle Embry, Stefan Gafner, Holly Johnson, Josh Kellogg, Julie Krzykwa, Siheng Li, Constance A Mitchell and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Nutrients · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Chemical Standardization of Milk Thistle (Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Suramya WaidyanathaDivision of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Bradley J CollinsDivision of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Tim CristyBattelle, Columbus, OH, USA.
Michelle EmbryHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Stefan GafnerAmerican Botanical Council, Austin, TX, USA.
Holly JohnsonAmerican Herbal Products Association, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Josh KelloggDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Julie KrzykwaHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Siheng LidōTerra, Pleasant Grove, Utah, USA.
Constance A MitchellHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: cmitchell@hesiglobal.org.
Esra MutluDivision of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Sarah PickettMRIGlobal, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Hong YouEurofins Botanical Testing US, Inc., Brea, CA, USA.
Richard Van BreemenOregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Timothy R BakerProcter and Gamble, Mason, OH, USA.
Health and Environmental Sciences Institute · USTriangle · USAmerican Nurses Association · USBattelle · USBotanical Society of America · USEurofins (United States) · USMRIGlobal · USOregon State University · USPennsylvania State University · USProcter & Gamble (United States) · US

Funding

Combined Exposures and Mixtures Research ProgramZIAES103373 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RIDER, CYNTHIA · 2022 to 2025
$5.6M
Chemistry Services Supporting the Division of Translational ToxicologyZICES103391 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WAIDYANATHA, SURAMYA · 2023 to 2025
$3.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES103373Intramural NIH HHS ZIC ES103391NIEHS NIH HHS HHSN273201400020CNIEHS NIH HHS HHSN273201400027C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increases in botanical use, encompassing herbal medicines and dietary supplements, have underlined a critical need for an advancement in safety assessment methodologies. However, botanicals present unique challenges for safety assessment due to their complex and variable composition arising from diverse growing conditions, processing methods, and plant varieties. Historically, botanicals have been largely evaluated based on their history of use information, based primarily on traditional use or dietary history. However, this presumption lacks comprehensive toxicological evaluation, demanding innovative and consistent assessment strategies. To address these challenges, the Botanical Safety Consortium (BSC) was formed as an international, cross-sector forum of experts to identify fit-for purpose assays that can be used to evaluate botanical safety. This global effort aims to assess botanical safety assessment methodologies, merging traditional knowledge with modern in vitro and in silico assays. The ultimate goal is to champion the development of toxicity tools for botanicals. This manuscript highlights: 1) BSC's strategy for botanical selection, sourcing, and preparation of extracts to be used in in vitro assays, and 2) the approach utilized to characterize botanical extracts, using green tea and Asian ginseng as examples, to build confidence for use in biological assays.

Indexed as

Plants, MedicinalDietary SupplementsTeaTea

Identifiers

PMID38417538
PMCPMC11238631
OpenAlexW4392202134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.