Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38416677›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Principled and interpretable alignability testing and integration of single-cell data.

Rong Ma, Eric D Sun, David Donoho, James Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Wasserstein F-tests for Fréchet regression on Bures-Wasserstein manifolds.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rong MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0002-9248-8503
Eric D SunDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
David DonohoDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
James ZouDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

Funding

Center for Sub-Cellular GenomicsRM1HG010023 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EBERWINE, JAMES H, KIM, JUNHYONG · 2018 to 2022
$11.0M
Stanford Medicine Center for Longevity and Healthy Aging Research Education CoreP30AG059307 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PERIYAKOIL, VYJEYANTHI S, YESAVAGE, JEROME A · 2018 to 2025
$4.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG010023NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell data integration can provide a comprehensive molecular view of cells, and many algorithms have been developed to remove unwanted technical or biological variations and integrate heterogeneous single-cell datasets. Despite their wide usage, existing methods suffer from several fundamental limitations. In particular, we lack a rigorous statistical test for whether two high-dimensional single-cell datasets are alignable (and therefore should even be aligned). Moreover, popular methods can substantially distort the data during alignment, making the aligned data and downstream analysis difficult to interpret. To overcome these limitations, we present a spectral manifold alignment and inference (SMAI) framework, which enables principled and interpretable alignability testing and structure-preserving integration of single-cell data with the same type of features. SMAI provides a statistical test to robustly assess the alignability between datasets to avoid misleading inference and is justified by high-dimensional statistical theory. On a diverse range of real and simulated benchmark datasets, it outperforms commonly used alignment methods. Moreover, we show that SMAI improves various downstream analyses such as identification of differentially expressed genes and imputation of single-cell spatial transcriptomics, providing further biological insights. SMAI's interpretability also enables quantification and a deeper understanding of the sources of technical confounders in single-cell data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingGene ExpressionSingle-Cell Analysisdata alignmentProcrustes analysisrandom matrix theorysingle-cell omicsspectral method

Identifiers

PMID38416677
PMCPMC10927515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.