Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38416562›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

How to Identify e-Cigarette Brands Available in the United States During 2020-2022: Development and Usability Study.

Shaoying Ma, Aadeeba Kaareen, Hojin Park, Yanyun He, Shuning Jiang, Zefeng Qiu, Zidian Xie, Dongmei Li, Jian Chen, Richard J O'Connor and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trends in product characteristics of disposable e-cigarettes sold by US online stores between 2022 and 2024.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  3. Where Do E-cigarette Users Buy Their E-cigarette Products? Results From a Nationally Representative Sample of Adult E-cigarette Users in the United States.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shaoying Ma *Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-0622
Aadeeba Kaareen *Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3999-0294
Hojin ParkCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5581-6427
Yanyun HeCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6279-6102
Shuning JiangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-2818
Zefeng QiuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8451-8001
Zidian XieDepartment of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5149-7710
Dongmei LiDepartment of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-2483
Jian ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1599-0831
Richard J O'ConnorDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-182X
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9098-6472
Ce ShangCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8838-4250

Funding

Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
WNY Center for Research on Flavored Tobacco Products (CRoFT)U54CA228110 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BANSAL-TRAVERS, MAANSI · 2018 to 2022
$19.8M
The Ohio State University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (OSU-TCORS)U54CA287392 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Peter G. Shields, Theodore Lee Wagener · 2023 to 2026
$19.5M
Tobacco Industry Marketing CoreU54CA229973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STRASSER, ANDREW A · 2018 to 2022
$18.8M
Rutgers Center of Excellence in Rapid Surveillance of TobaccoU01CA278695 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CRISTINE D DELNEVO, Ollie Ganz · 2023 to 2026
$14.0M
The impact of ENDS tax policies on the consumption of ENDS and cigarettesR21CA249757 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHANG, CE · 2021 to 2021
$401k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512NCI NIH HHS R21 CA249757NCI NIH HHS U01 CA278695NCI NIH HHS U54 CA228110NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229973NCI NIH HHS U54 CA287392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies have demonstrated that the e-cigarette market contains a large number of brands. Identifying these existing e-cigarette brands is a key element of market surveillance, which will further assist in policy making and compliance checks.

objectiveTo facilitate the surveillance of the diverse product landscape in the e-cigarette market, we constructed a semantic database of e-cigarette brands that have appeared in the US market as of 2020-2022.

methodsIn order to build the brand database, we searched and compiled e-cigarette brands from a comprehensive list of retail channels and sources, including (1) e-liquid and disposable brands sold in web-based stores, (2) e-cigarette brands sold in brick-and-mortar stores and collected by the Nielsen Retail Scanner Data, (3) e-cigarette brands compiled by Wikipedia, (4) self-reported e-cigarette brands from the 2020 International Tobacco Control Four-Country Smoking and Vaping (ITC 4CV) US survey, and (5) e-cigarette brands on Twitter. We also estimated the top 5 e-cigarette brands by sales volume in brick-and-mortar stores, by the frequency and variety of offerings in web-based shops, and by the frequency of self-reported brands from the 2020 ITC 4CV US survey.

resultsAs of 2020-2022, a total of 912 e-cigarette brands have been sold by various retail channels. During 2020-2022, the top 5 brands are JUUL, vuse, njoy, blu, and logic in brick-and-mortar stores; blu, king, monster, twist, and air factory for e-liquids in web-based stores; hyde, pod mesh, suorin, vaporlax, and xtra for disposables sold in web-based stores; and smok, aspire, vaporesso, innokin, and eleaf based on self-reported survey data.

conclusionsAs the US Food and Drug Administration enforces the premarket tobacco market authorization, many e-cigarette brands may become illegal in the US market. In this context, how e-cigarette brands evolve and consolidate in different retail channels will be critical for understanding the regulatory impacts on product availability. Our semantic database of e-cigarette brands can serve as a useful tool to monitor product and marketplace development, conduct compliance checks, assess manufacturers' marketing behaviors, and identify regulatory impacts.

Indexed as

e-cigaretteelectronic cigaretteelectronic nicotine delivery systemelectronic nicotine delivery systemsmarket surveillancetobaccotobacco marketingvaping

Identifiers

PMID38416562
PMCPMC10938231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.