Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38416543›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2024

Barriers to and Facilitators of Older People's Engagement With Web-Based Services: Qualitative Study of Adults Aged >75 Years.

Annemarie Money, Alex Hall, Danielle Harris, Charlotte Eost-Telling, Jane McDermott, Chris Todd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Remote Work, Well-Being, and Healthy Labor Force Participation Among Older Adults: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annemarie MoneySchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1714-2470
Alex HallSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8849-744X
Danielle HarrisSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3330-7346
Charlotte Eost-TellingSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9568-3195
Jane McDermottSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9039-504X
Chris ToddSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6645-4505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift toward the digital provision of many public services, including health and social care, public administration, and financial and leisure services. COVID-19 services including test appointments, results, vaccination appointments and more were primarily delivered through digital channels to the public. Many social, cultural, and economic activities (appointments, ticket bookings, tax and utility payments, shopping, etc) have transitioned to web-based platforms. To use web-based public services, individuals must be digitally included. This is influenced by 3 main factors: access (whether individuals have access to the internet), ability (having the requisite skills and confidence to participate over the web), and affordability (ability to pay for infrastructure [equipment] and data packages). Many older adults, especially those aged >75 years, are still digitally excluded.

objectiveThis study aims to explore the views of adults aged >75 years on accessing public services digitally.

methodsWe conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with a variety of adults aged ≥75 years residing in Greater Manchester, United Kingdom. We also interviewed community support workers. Thematic analysis was used to identify the key themes from the data.

resultsOverall, 24 older adults (mean age 81, SD 4.54 y; 14/24, 58% female; 23/24, 96% White British; and 18/24, 75% digitally engaged to some extent) and 2 support workers participated. A total of five themes were identified as key in understanding issues around motivation, engagement, and participation: (1) "initial motivation to participate digitally"-for example, maintaining social connections and gaining skills to be able to connect with family and friends; (2) "narrow use and restricted activity on the web"-undertaking limited tasks on the web and in a modified manner, for example, limited use of web-based public services and selected use of specific services, such as checking but never transferring funds during web-based banking; (3) "impact of digital participation on well-being"-choosing to go to the shops or general practitioner's surgery to get out of the house and get some exercise; (4) "the last generation?"-respondents feeling that there were generational barriers to adapting to new technology and change; and (5) "making digital accessible"-understanding the support needed to keep those engaged on the web.

conclusionsAs we transition toward greater digitalization of public services, it is crucial to incorporate the perspectives of older people. Failing to do so risks excluding them from accessing services they greatly rely on and need.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAgedAged, 80 and overBooksFemaleHumansInternetMaleQualitative Researchageddigital exclusiondigital inclusioninternetolder peopletechnologyweb-based

Identifiers

PMID38416543
PMCPMC10938227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.