ArticleJAMA dermatology2024
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Mortality in Cutaneous Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolving Paradigms in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: From Global Immunosuppression to Precision Targeted and Cell-Based Therapies.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Pooled it
- Toward Better Response Assessment of Cutaneous Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Report from the National Institutes of Health Consensus Project Task Force.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Guideline
- A Review of Modern Therapies and New Innovations in the Treatment of Cutaneous Graft-versus-Host Disease.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Refractory Mucocutaneous Infections by Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Real-world, Multicenter Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Patient-reported outcomes in chronic GVHD: instruments, clinical utility, and survivorship integration.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Review
- Acute and Chronic Cutaneous Graft-versus-Host Disease: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Emerging Directions.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Discordance in Treatment Response Assessment Between Clinicians and Patients With Skin Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease.JAMA dermatology · 2026Observational
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors of acute cutaneous graft-vs.-host disease following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Lichenoid graft-versus-host disease shows a high interferon score, with IFNAR1 inhibition preventing skin inflammation.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Article
- Oral Health Characteristics 2 Years following Allogeneic Cell Transplant.Journal of dental research · 2025Observational
- Elephantiasis nostra verrucosa in sclerodermatous chronic graft-versus-host disease.JAAD case reports · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Importance to Patients Living With Cutaneous Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease.JAMA dermatology · 2025Article
- Beyond the blockade: unmet needs in systemic targeted atopic dermatitis therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Cord Blood-Derived Platelet Gel in Wound Healing: From Biological Rationale to Clinical Application.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is associated with impaired quality of life and symptom burden. The independent association of skin involvement with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and their utility as a clinical prognostic marker remain unknown. Identification of patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD and impaired PROs could assist in initial risk stratification and treatment selection. Objective: To compare the association of sclerotic and epidermal-type chronic GVHD with longitudinal PROs and to evaluate whether PROs can identify patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD at high risk for death. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter prospective cohort study involved patients from the Chronic GVHD Consortium of 9 US medical centers, enrolled between August 2007 and April 2012, and followed up until December 2020. Participants included adults 18 years and older with a diagnosis of chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression and with skin involvement during the study period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported symptom burden was assessed using the Lee Symptom Scale (LSS) skin subscale with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Quality of life was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation (FACT-BMT) instrument with lower scores indicating worse outcomes. Nonrelapse mortality, overall survival, and their association with PROs at diagnosis were also assessed. Results: Among 436 patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD (median [IQR] age at transplant, 51 [41.5-56.6] years; 261 [59.9%] male), 229 patients had epidermal-type chronic GVHD (52.5%), followed by 131 with sclerotic chronic GVHD (30.0%), and 76 with combination disease (17.4%). After adjusting for confounders, patients with sclerotic chronic GVHD had mean FACT-BMT scores 6.1 points worse than those with epidermal disease (95% CI, 11.7-0.4; P = .04). Patients with combination disease had mean LSS skin subscale scores 9.0 points worse than those with epidermal disease (95% CI, 4.2-13.8; P < .001). Clinically meaningful differences were defined as at least 7 points lower for FACT-BMT and 11 points higher for LSS skin subscale. At diagnosis, clinically meaningful worsening in FACT-BMT score was associated with an adjusted odds of nonrelapse mortality increased by 9.1% (95% CI, 2.0%-16.7%; P = .01). Similarly, for clinically meaningful worsening in LSS skin subscale score, adjusted odds of nonrelapse mortality increased by 16.4% (95% CI, 5.4%-28.5%; P = .003). These associations held true after adjusting for clinical severity by the National Institutes of Health Skin Score. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study demonstrated that skin chronic GVHD was independently associated with long-term PRO impairment, with sclerotic and combination disease carrying the highest morbidity. The degree of impairment at skin chronic GVHD diagnosis was a prognostic marker for mortality. Therefore, PROs could be useful for risk stratification and treatment selection in clinical practice and clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.