ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024
Brain identification of IBS patients based on GBDT and multiple imaging techniques.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The brain biomarker of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients is still lacking. The study aims to explore a new technology studying the brain alterations of IBS patients based on multi-source brain data. In the study, a decision-level fusion method based on gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) was proposed. Next, 100 healthy subjects were used to validate the effectiveness of the method. Finally, the identification of brain alterations and the pain evaluation in IBS patients were carried out by the fusion method based on the resting-state fMRI and DWI for 46 patients and 46 controls selected randomly from 100 healthy subjects. The results showed that the method can achieve good classification between IBS patients and controls (accuracy = 95%) and pain evaluation of IBS patients (mean absolute error = 0.1977). Moreover, both the gain-based and the permutation-based evaluation instead of statistical analysis showed that left cingulum bundle contributed most significantly to the classification, and right precuneus contributed most significantly to the evaluation of abdominal pain intensity in the IBS patients. The differences seem to suggest a probable but unexplored separation about the central regions between the identification and progression of IBS. This finding may provide one new thought and technology for brain alteration related to IBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.