Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38416322›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2024

Bayesian Vancomycin Model Selection for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neonates.

Dua'a Alrahahleh, Yann Thoma, Ruth Van Daele, Thi Nguyen, Stephanie Halena, Melissa Luig, Sophie Stocker, Hannah Yejin Kim, Jan-Willem Alffenaar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dua'a AlrahahlehFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy Building (A15), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Yann ThomaSchool of Engineering and Management Vaud, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 1400, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland.
Ruth Van DaeleDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Thi NguyenFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy Building (A15), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Stephanie HalenaDepartment of Pharmacy, Westmead Hospital, NSW, Westmead, Australia.
Melissa LuigDepartment of Neonatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Sophie StockerFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy Building (A15), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Hannah Yejin KimFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy Building (A15), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Jan-Willem AlffenaarFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy Building (A15), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. johannes.alffenaar@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6703-0288
The University of Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AUHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePharmacokinetic models can inform drug dosing of vancomycin in neonates to optimize therapy. However, the model selected needs to describe the intended population to provide appropriate dose recommendations. Our study aims to identify the population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model(s) with the best performance to predict vancomycin exposure in neonates in our hospital.

methodsRelevant published PopPK models for vancomycin in neonates were selected based on demographics and vancomycin dosing strategy. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated in Tucuxi using a local cohort of 69 neonates. Mean absolute error (MAE), relative bias (rBias) and relative root mean square error (rRMSE) were used to quantify the accuracy and precision of the predictive performance of each model for three different approaches: a priori, a posteriori, and Bayesian forecasting for the next course of therapy based on the previous course predictions. A PopPK model was considered clinically acceptable if rBias was between ± 20 and 95% confidence intervals included zero.

resultsA total of 25 PopPK models were identified and nine were considered suitable for further evaluation. The model of De Cock et al. 2014 was the only clinically acceptable model based on a priori [MAE 0.35 mg/L, rBias 0.8 % (95% confidence interval (CI) - 7.5, 9.1%), and rRMSE 8.9%], a posteriori [MAE 0.037 mg/L, rBias - 0.23% (95% CI - 1.3, 0.88%), and rRMSE 6.02%] and Bayesian forecasting for the next courses [MAE 0.89 mg/L, rBias 5.45% (95% CI - 8.2, 19.1%), and rRMSE 38.3%) approaches.

conclusionsThe De Cock model was selected based on a comprehensive approach of model selection to individualize vancomycin dosing in our neonates.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinBayes TheoremDrug MonitoringForecastingHumansInfant, NewbornAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID38416322
PMCPMC10954945
OpenAlexW4392239048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.