ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2024
Discrimination of the acute pulmonary embolism subtypes based on the novel MAPH score.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- MAPH score improves stroke risk prediction in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a comparison with CHA₂DS₂-VASc.Cardiology journal · 2026Article
- Characteristics, management and outcomes of central versus peripheral pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study.Thrombosis journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is a thromboembolism situation that can be central or peripheral. APE risk analysis and classification are essential for therapy planning. Our aim is to determine the novel MAPH score (including age, mean platelet volume (MPV), total protein, and hematocrit parameters) that can distinguish APE subtypes. Our retrospective cohort analysis includes 97 APE patients referred to the emergency medicine department who underwent pulmonary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in 24 h from 2020 to 2022. The hospital information system provided demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pulmonary CTA data. APE was classified into central (46 patients) and peripheral (51 patients) depending on the area of vascular involvement. The central APE group had higher hypertension (HT) (67.4%) and atrial fibrillation (AF) (39.1%) incidence than the peripheral APE group (all p values > 0.05). The central APE had higher total protein and platelet counts (p = 0.003 and p = 0.036), but peripheral APE had higher troponin values (p = 0.029). Central APE had 2.17 ± 0.85 MAPH and peripheral APE 1.76 ± 0.95 (p = 0.029). HT, AF, platelet count, and MAPH score differed significantly in univariate logistic regression (all p values < 0.05). However, only platelet count varied in multivariate logistic regression (p = 0.042). ROC curve analysis revealed that the MAPH score predicts central APE with 83% sensitivity and 45% specificity at a cut-off level of 1.5. The new MAPH score as an indicator of blood viscosity may distinguish between central and peripheral APE. Our result is significant, especially for centers with limited examinations, as it may accelerate the diagnosis and treatment processes. We think that our results might guide future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.