Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38416275›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2024

Peer-to-Peer Chain Recruitment for Enrolling Young South African Women into an HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Intervention Study: How Did It Perform?

Judy Fordjuoh, Curtis Dolezal, Nonhlonipho Bhengu, Abigail D Harrison, Theresa M Exner, Jill Hanass-Hancock, Susie Hoffman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04833127 (Developing a Gender-Enhanced Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04833127 phase1completednot on this map

Developing a Gender-Enhanced Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Information-Motivational Workshop for Young South African Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York State Psychiatric InstituteRan2021 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsGender-Enhanced -- Masibambane, Individually accessed
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Judy FordjuohDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. judy3fordjuoh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6867-3071
Curtis Dolezal *HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5980-1617
Nonhlonipho Bhengu *South African Medical Research Council, Gender and Health Research Unit, Durban, South Africa.
Abigail D HarrisonDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1673-8486
Theresa M ExnerHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Jill Hanass-Hancock *South African Medical Research Council, Gender and Health Research Unit, Durban, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-8548
Susie Hoffman *Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1870-4853
New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZABrown University · USColumbia University · US

Funding

GENERAL ETHNIC IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT AND AFRICAN AMERICANF31MH011578 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI CHAVOUS, TABBYE M · 1997 to 1997
–
NIMH NIH HHS R34MH11578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer-to-peer chain recruitment has been used for descriptive studies, but few intervention studies have employed it. We used this method to enroll sexually active women ages 18 to 25 into an online Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) information and motivation intervention pilot in eThekwini (Durban), South Africa. Seeds (N = 16) were recruited by study staff and randomized to Masibambane, Ladies Chat, a Gender-Enhanced group-based WhatsApp Workshop (GE), or Individual-Access (IA), a control condition that provided participants with online information/motivation materials only. Each seed could recruit up to three women to participate in the same study condition, with an incentive for each enrolled woman; participants in subsequent waves could choose to recruit or not. We evaluated if peer-to-peer recruitment was self-sustaining and resulted in enrolling women who, in subsequent waves, had less contact with the health care system and less knowledge about PrEP than the initial seeds. Over three recruitment waves beyond the seeds, 84 women were recruited. Almost 90% of women became recruiters, with each recruiting on average 1.90 women and 1.26 eligible enrolled women. The approach was successful at reaching women with less education but not women with less health system contact and PrEP knowledge across waves. IA participants had a slightly higher, though non-significantly different, percentage of individuals who became Peer Health Advocates (PHAs) than GE participants and, on average, they recruited slightly more women who enrolled. Our findings demonstrated that peer-to-peer recruitment is a feasible and self-sustaining way to recruit SA young women into a PrEP intervention study.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPatient SelectionPeer GroupPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMotivationPilot ProjectsSouth AfricaYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsHIV/AIDs preventionPeer-to-peer recruitmentPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)Respondent driven samplingSouth AfricaYoung women

Identifiers

PMID38416275
OpenAlexW4392234641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.