Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38416032›Full record

SynthesisJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2024

Do Peer Navigators Improve Initiation and Retention in HIV/VH/STI Treatment Programs for People From Key Populations? A Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Values and Preferences, and Cost.

Caitlin E Kennedy, Ping T Yeh, Annette Verster, Niklas Luhmann, Van T T Nguyen, Maeve B de Mello, Rachel Baggaley, Virginia Macdonald

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. An Evidence-Based Approach to Facilitating PrEP Initiation Among YMSM: The MyPEEPS Plus mHealth and E-Peer Navigation Intervention.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Integration of Peer Navigators Into Longitudinal Research.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2025
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caitlin E KennedyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; and.
Ping T YehDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; and.ORCID 0000-0002-7425-0382
Annette VersterDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Niklas LuhmannDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Van T T NguyenDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Maeve B de MelloDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rachel BaggaleyDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Virginia MacdonaldDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKey populations are disproportionately affected by HIV, viral hepatitis (VH), and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and face barriers to care. Peer navigation programs are widely used, but evidence supporting their use has not been synthesized.

settingPeer navigation programs for sex workers, men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, prisoners, and trans and gender diverse people globally.

methodsTo inform World Health Organization guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of effectiveness, values and preferences, and cost studies published between January 2010 and May 2021. We searched CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and EMBASE; screened abstracts; and extracted data in duplicate. The effectiveness review included randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies evaluating time to diagnosis or linkage to care, treatment initiation, treatment retention/completion, viral load, cure, or mortality. We assessed risk of bias and summarized findings in GRADE evidence profiles. Values and preferences and cost data were summarized descriptively.

resultsFour studies evaluated the effectiveness of peer navigators for key populations. All were focused on HIV; none were designed for VH or STIs. These studies showed mixed effects on linkage to care, treatment retention/completion, and viral load; no studies measured treatment initiation, cure, or mortality. Two values and preferences studies with community-based organization staff and health workers suggested peer navigators for key populations were acceptable and valued, although continued challenges remained. No cost studies were identified.

conclusionsAlthough limited, available studies provide moderate certainty evidence for benefits of HIV/VH/STI peer navigation programs for key populations. Further evaluations are needed.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMedication AdherenceRetention in CareHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID38416032
PMCPMC10896188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.