ArticleMedical physics2024
Deep learning-based harmonization of trabecular bone microstructures between high- and low-resolution CT imaging.
Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel computed tomography-based algorithm for the quantitative identification of lumbar spine-localized trabecular bone loss in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in osteoporosis assessment using CT imaging: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of unified harmonization of CT images across multiple tasks: A step towards AI generalizability.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteoporosis is a bone disease related to increased bone loss and fracture-risk. The variability in bone strength is partially explained by bone mineral density (BMD), and the remainder is contributed by bone microstructure. Recently, clinical CT has emerged as a viable option for in vivo bone microstructural imaging. Wide variations in spatial-resolution and other imaging features among different CT scanners add inconsistency to derived bone microstructural metrics, urging the need for harmonization of image data from different scanners. PURPOSE: This paper presents a new deep learning (DL) method for the harmonization of bone microstructural images derived from low- and high-resolution CT scanners and evaluates the method's performance at the levels of image data as well as derived microstructural metrics.
methodsWe generalized a three-dimensional (3D) version of GAN-CIRCLE that applies two generative adversarial networks (GANs) constrained by the identical, residual, and cycle learning ensemble (CIRCLE). Two GAN modules simultaneously learn to map low-resolution CT (LRCT) to high-resolution CT (HRCT) and vice versa. Twenty volunteers were recruited. LRCT and HRCT scans of the distal tibia of their left legs were acquired. Five-hundred pairs of LRCT and HRCT image blocks of
resultsMean ± standard deviation of structural similarity (SSIM) values between predicted and true HRCT using both 3DGAN-CIRCLE-based supervised (0.84 ± 0.03) and unsupervised (0.83 ± 0.04) methods were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than the mean SSIM value between LRCT and true HRCT (0.75 ± 0.03). All Tb measures derived from predicted HRCT by the supervised 3DGAN-CIRCLE showed higher agreement (CCC
conclusions3DGAN-CIRCLE, trained in either unsupervised or supervised fashion, generates HRCT images with high structural similarity to the reference true HRCT images. The supervised 3DGAN-CIRCLE improves agreements of computed Tb microstructural measures with their reference values and outperforms the unsupervised 3DGAN-CIRCLE. 3DGAN-CIRCLE offers a viable DL solution to retrospectively improve image resolution, which may aid in data harmonization in multi-site longitudinal studies where scanner mismatch is unavoidable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.