Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38415680›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2024

Assessment and rehabilitation of tongue motor skills with myofunctional therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

William Poncin, Ambre Willemsens, Lucile Gely, Olivier Contal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

William PoncinInstitut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL et Dermatologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Ambre WillemsensService de Pneumologie, CHIREC Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Lucile GelyInstitut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL et Dermatologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Olivier ContalSchool of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Centre Hospitalier Interrégional Edith Cavell · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesThe first objective of this study was to compare tongue motor skills between patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and healthy participants. Second, the effect of oropharyngeal myofunctional therapy (MFT) on the tongue muscular qualities of patients with OSA was evaluated.

methodsSearches were conducted in 5 electronic databases up to July 2023. Risk of bias was assessed via the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal checklist for cross-sectional studies (aim number 1) and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale for randomized controlled trials (aim number 2). Pooled standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model.

resultsThirteen studies including 520 adults and one study including 92 children addressed aim number 1. Compared to healthy adults, individuals with OSA had no significant difference in tongue protrusion strength (9 studies, n = 366; standardized mean difference [95% confidence interval], -0.00 [-0.45, 0.44]) or endurance (5 studies, n = 125; 0.31 [-0.26, 0.88]) but presented a lower tongue elevation strength (6 studies, n = 243; 1.00 [0.47, 1.53]) and elevation endurance (3 studies, n = 98; 0.52 [0.11, 0.94]). In children, tongue elevation strength was lower but elevation endurance was higher in those with OSA than in healthy children. Two randomized controlled trials (28 adults, 54 children) addressed aim number 2 and were of poor methodological quality. In these studies, myofunctional therapy improved tongue motor skills in patients with OSA.

conclusionsTongue elevation motor skills are decreased in adults with OSA, whereas tongue protrusion motor skills seem preserved. Very few data are available in children. There are also too few data about the impact of myofunctional therapy on tongue motor skills. CITATION: Poncin W, Willemsens A, Gely L, Contal O. Assessment and rehabilitation of tongue motor skills with myofunctional therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsMyofunctional TherapySleep Apnea, ObstructiveTongueHumansendurancehealthy individualsobstructive sleep apneaoropharyngeal myofunctional therapyrecoverystrengthtongueupper airway muscles

Identifiers

PMID38415680
PMCPMC11367718
OpenAlexW4392230166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.