ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024
Community Screening for High-Risk Human Papilloma Virus Infection using Self-Sampling and 'Point-Of-Care' Test.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of cervico-vaginal high-risk human papillomavirus prevalence in India prior to nationwide human papillomavirus vaccination.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence of CMV, EBV, HPV, and HSV among South Asian healthy population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHR-HPV types 16 and 18 are responsible for pre-invasive and invasive lesions of the cervix, accounting for 70-80% of the total subtypes. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of high-risk HPV subtypes 16 and 18 in self-collected vaginal samples using real-time micro-PCR and to study the acceptability of self-sampling.
methodsEligible women (30-65 years) were screened from a semi-urban area of Uttarakhand (India) using self-sampling. High-risk HPV genotypes (16/31 and 18/45) were tested using real-time micro-PCR technique with results available in one hour. The positive results were validated by standard RT-PCR for high-risk HPV 16, 18, separately and for 12 other high-risk genotypes, combined. Ease of the procedure, level of comfort, and recommendation to other women were studied and the acceptability of self-sampling was analyzed using the Likert scale.
resultOf 975 eligible women screened, 45 participants tested positive for HR-HPV (16/31,18/45) using real-time micro-PCR with a prevalence of 4.6%. Positive samples were further tested through routine RT-PCR and 60% were found to be HR-HPV 16 and 18 positive. For self-sampling, 96.72% (n=943) participants were 'very satisfied' and 94.15% (n=918) found self-sampling to be 'very comfortable' and 88.51% (n=863) stated that they will strongly recommend this test to other eligible women in the community.
conclusionWe conclude that HR-HPV testing with limited genotyping showed a prevalence of 4.6%, 60% of these were HPV 16/18 positive. Point of care testing was feasible in the community and self-sampling was acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.