ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024
Effect of Integrated Survivorship Model on Physical Health for Breast Cancer Survivors in Rural Area.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Multi-component Exercise Program on Body Composition and Physical, Emotional and Social well being in Breast Cancer Survivors.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Trial
- Effect of Multi-component Exercise Program on Functional Performance in Breast Cancer Survivors.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the integrated survivorship model on the physical health of breast cancer survivors in rural areas.
methodsNinety-two patients who were breast cancer survivors were selected as per inclusion criteria and divided into two groups (control group and intervention group). The participants were randomly allotted to two groups of 46 each. A 12-minute walk test, assessment of quality of life, and difficulty in return to work were used as outcome measures. The integrated survivorship model was implemented in one group for 3 months while the other group was a supporting group and was involved in household activities only. Pre-assessment and post-assessment were taken to evaluate the effect of the integrated survivorship model. All the statistical analysis was done using SPSS statistical Software (version 23.0 for Windows; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, USA) and the results were obtained.
resultsThe results revealed that the assessment of the 12-minute walk test, physical well-being, social/family well-being, functional well-being, and difficulty in returning to work showed extremely significant results in the intervention group with a p-value of less than 0.0001. Similarly, emotional well-being and additional concern domains showed significant results in the intervention group. Hence, the findings of this study revealed significance in post-assessment in all the outcome measures of the experimental group.
conclusionThe study showed that all the outcome measures such as the 12-minute walk test, assessment of quality of life, and difficulty in return to work were impaired in both groups before the study. The effect of the model showed a significant improvement in the intervention group after implementing the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.