SynthesisCurrent medicinal chemistry2025
Clinical Outcomes and Effectiveness of CRLX101 for Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Camptothecin-Class Compounds Nanomedicines: A Comprehensive Review of Antitumor Strategies.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Radiosensitization in Breast Cancer: A Multimodal Approach to Therapy and Immune Regulation.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Polymer Nanoparticles Advancements for Gynecological Cancers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile it has been demonstrated that delivery of cytotoxic chemotherapy using nanoparticles greatly improves patient drug tolerance and reduces toxicity when compared to the standard formulation, the crucial question of whether they also increase anticancer efficacy remains. The CRLX101 is a nanoparticle composed of cyclodextrin and 20(S)-camptothecin cytotoxic chemotherapy.
objectiveIn order to compare the efficacy of the CRLX101 to its corresponding traditional formulation, we carried out this systematic literature search for randomized clinical and non-randomized trials.
methodsMultiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, were used to conduct a thorough literature search. By employing a technique akin to a random-effects model, the median of the study-specific was taken into account as the pooled median estimate with a 95% confidence interval.
resultsFinally, nine clinical studies were chosen for the meta-analysis. The treatment and control groups' overall survival were examined in five and three trials, respectively. Additionally, six out of nine trials and two out of nine trials, respectively, examined the treatment and control groups for progression-free survival (PFS). Meta-analysis revealed that the treatment group had a lower median overall survival (OS) but a greater median progression-free survival than the control group.
conclusionOur meta-analysis shows that CRLX101 outperforms camptothecin in PFS despite its inferior OS. Unresolved pharmacology limits carrier-mediated drug therapeutic application. Carrier-mediated dosages may differ from normal formulations because they are rarely studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.