Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38415180›Full record

ArticleMedical image learning with limited and noisy data : second international workshop, MILLanD 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, proceedings. MILLanD (Workshop) : (2nd : 2023 : Vancouver, B...2023

Automatic Quantification of COVID-19 Pulmonary Edema by Self-supervised Contrastive Learning.

Zhaohui Liang, Zhiyun Xue, Sivaramakrishnan Rajaraman, Yang Feng, Sameer Antani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image learning with limited and noisy data : second international workshop, MILLanD 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, proceedings. MILLanD (Workshop) : (2nd : 2023 : Vancouver, B..., 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhaohui LiangComputational Health Research Branch, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9361-5535
Zhiyun XueComputational Health Research Branch, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0644-385X
Sivaramakrishnan RajaramanComputational Health Research Branch, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0871-8634
Yang FengComputational Health Research Branch, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8334-7450
Sameer AntaniComputational Health Research Branch, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0040-1387
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for clinical medical image processingZIALM010018 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ANTANI, SAMEER · 2021 to 2025
$9.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM010018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We proposed a self-supervised machine learning method to automatically rate the severity of pulmonary edema in the frontal chest X-ray radiographs (CXR) which could be potentially related to COVID-19 viral pneumonia. For this we use the modified radiographic assessment of lung edema (mRALE) scoring system. The new model was first optimized with the simple Siamese network (SimSiam) architecture where a ResNet-50 pretrained by ImageNet database was used as the backbone. The encoder projected a 2048-dimension embedding as representation features to a downstream fully connected deep neural network for mRALE score prediction. A 5-fold cross-validation with 2,599 frontal CXRs was used to examine the new model's performance with comparison to a non-pretrained SimSiam encoder and a ResNet-50 trained from scratch. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the new model is 5.05 (95%CI 5.03-5.08), the mean squared error (MSE) is 66.67 (95%CI 66.29-67.06), and the Spearman's correlation coefficient (Spearman ρ) to the expert-annotated scores is 0.77 (95%CI 0.75-0.79). All the performance metrics of the new model are superior to the two comparators (P<0.01), and the scores of MSE and Spearman ρ of the two comparators have no statistical difference (P>0.05). The model also achieved a prediction probability concordance of 0.811 and a quadratic weighted kappa of 0.739 with the medical expert annotations in external validation. We conclude that the self-supervised contrastive learning method is an effective strategy for mRALE automated scoring. It provides a new approach to improve machine learning performance and minimize the expert knowledge involvement in quantitative medical image pattern learning.

Indexed as

Contrastive LearningCOVID-19Deep LearningPulmonary EdemaSelf-supervised Learning

Identifiers

PMID38415180
PMCPMC10896252
OpenAlexW4387422473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.