Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38415165›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of retromandibular vein position and course patterns relative to the mandible during sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Keisuke Sugahara, Koki Oiwa, Satoru Matsunaga, Kento Odaka, Hidetomo Hirouchi, Masahide Koyachi, Norio Kasahara, Chie Tachiki, Yasushi Nishii, Klaus-Dietrich Wolff and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Keisuke Sugahara *Department of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Koki Oiwa *Department of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru MatsunagaOral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Kento OdakaOral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidetomo HirouchiDepartment of Anatomy, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahide KoyachiDepartment of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio KasaharaOral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Chie TachikiDepartment of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi NishiiDepartment of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Klaus-Dietrich WolffDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Technical University Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, München, Germany.
Akira KatakuraDepartment of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Dental College · JPKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sagittal split ramus osteotomy is an established procedure used in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Major bleeding is representative intraoperative complication involves vessels such as the inferior alveolar, facial, and maxillary arteries and accompanying veins, in particular the retromandibular vein (RMV). We previously described the RMV course patterns using embalmed cadavers. However, owing to the possible influence of formalin fixation and unclear skeletal classification of the jaws, the present study aimed to use contrast-enhanced computed tomography to confirm the RMV in patients with defined jaw deformities. Methods: Twenty patients with orthognathic jaw deformities (40 sides) were included. The RMV and the lateral and posterior views of the mandible were evaluated using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Course patterns and RMV positions were classified as previously reported. Results: Three patterns were identified in the lateral view. Type A: RMV posterior to the posterior border of the ramus (n=25; 62.5%). Type B: adjoining the posterior border of the ramus (n=12; 30.0%). Type C: anterior to the posterior border of the ramus (n=3; 7.5%). Five course patterns were identified in the posterior view. Pattern I: rectilinear course running medial to the posterior border of the ramus (n=3; 7.5%). Pattern II: diagonal course running medially from immediately posterior to posterior border of the ramus (n=11; 27.5%). Pattern III: rectilinear course running immediately posterior to the posterior border of the ramus (n=12; 30.0%). Pattern IV: diagonal course running from lateral to medial relative to the posterior border of the ramus (n=8; 20.0%). Pattern V: diagonal course running from lateral to immediately posterior relative to the posterior border of the ramus (n=6; 15.0%). In the no-course pattern group, the RMV inferior to the lingula was lateral to its position and superior to that of the lingula. In half of the cases, the left and right sides exhibited different running patterns. We observed no correlation between the skeletal patterns of jaw deformities and the course of the RMV. Conclusions: Type B/Pattern II that runs in a straight line bordering the posterior margin of the ramus requires the most attention during surgery. These findings suggest the possibility of predicting intraoperative bleeding risk.

Indexed as

blood vessel running directioncontrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT)mandibular ramusRetromandibular vein (RMV)sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO)

Identifiers

PMID38415165
PMCPMC10895111
OpenAlexW4391258637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.