Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38415154›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Usefulness of longitudinal nodule-matching algorithm in computer-aided diagnosis of new pulmonary metastases on cancer surveillance CT scans.

Sung Hyun Yoon, Dong Yul Oh, Hyo Jin Kim, Sowon Jang, Minseon Kim, Jihang Kim, Kyung Won Lee, Kyong Joon Lee, Junghoon Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unsupervised anomaly detection for longitudinal comparison in whole-body PET/CT images.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sung Hyun Yoon *Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Dong Yul Oh *Monitor Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyo Jin KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Sowon JangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Minseon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Jihang KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Won LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Kyong Joon LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Junghoon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Detecting new pulmonary metastases by comparing serial computed tomography (CT) scans is crucial, but a repetitive and time-consuming task that burdens the radiologists' workload. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a nodule-matching algorithm with deep learning-based computer-aided detection (DL-CAD) in diagnosing new pulmonary metastases on cancer surveillance CT scans. Methods: Among patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy between 2014 and 2018, 65 new pulmonary metastases missed by interpreting radiologists on cancer surveillance CT (Time 2) were identified after a retrospective comparison with the previous CT (Time 1). First, DL-CAD detected nodules in Time 1 and Time 2 CT images. All nodules detected at Time 2 were initially considered metastasis candidates. Second, the nodule-matching algorithm was used to assess the correlation between the nodules from the two CT scans and to classify the nodules at Time 2 as "new" or "pre-existing". Pre-existing nodules were excluded from metastasis candidates. We evaluated the performance of DL-CAD with the nodule-matching algorithm, based on its sensitivity, false-metastasis candidates per scan, and positive predictive value (PPV). Results: A total of 475 lesions were detected by DL-CAD at Time 2. Following a radiologist review, the lesions were categorized as metastases (n=54), benign nodules (n=392), and non-nodules (n=29). Upon comparison of nodules at Time 1 and 2 using the nodule-matching algorithm, all metastases were classified as new nodules without any matching errors. Out of 421 benign lesions, 202 (48.0%) were identified as pre-existing and subsequently excluded from the pool of metastasis candidates through the nodule-matching algorithm. As a result, false-metastasis candidates per CT scan decreased by 47.9% (from 7.1 to 3.7, P<0.001) and the PPV increased from 11.4% to 19.8% (P<0.001), while maintaining sensitivity. Conclusions: The nodule-matching algorithm improves the diagnostic performance of DL-CAD for new pulmonary metastases, by lowering the number of false-metastasis candidates without compromising sensitivity.

Indexed as

computed tomography (CT)computer-aided detection (CAD)Deep learning (DL)pulmonary metastasispulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID38415154
PMCPMC10895128
OpenAlexW4391268371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.