Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38415137›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Classification of superficial suspected lymph nodes: non-invasive radiomic model based on multiphase contrast-enhanced ultrasound for therapeutic options of lymphadenopathy.

Zhenzhen Jiang, Fang Yuan, Qi Zhang, Jianbo Zhu, Meina Xu, Yanfeng Hu, Chuanling Hou, Xiatian Liu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenzhen JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Fang YuanDepartment of Ultrasound, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Jianbo ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Meina XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Xiamen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Xiamen, China.
Yanfeng HuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Chuanling HouDepartment of Pathology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Xiatian LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Shaoxing People's Hospital · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNNingbo University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate determination of the types of lymphadenopathy is of great importance in disease diagnosis and treatment and is usually confirmed by pathological findings. Radiomics is a non-invasive tool that can extract quantitative information from medical images. Our study was designed to develop a non-invasive radiomic approach based on multiphase contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images for the classification of different types of lymphadenopathy. Methods: A total of 426 patients with superficial suspected lymph nodes (LNs) from three centres were grouped into a training cohort (n=190), an internal testing cohort (n=127), and an external testing cohort (n=109). The radiomic features were extracted from the prevascular phase, vascular phase, and postvascular phase of the CEUS images. Model 1 (the conventional feature model), model 2 (the multiphase radiomics model), and model 3 (the combined feature model) were established for lymphadenopathy classification. The area under the curve (AUC) and confusion matrix were used to evaluate the performance of the three models. The usefulness of the models was assessed in different threshold probabilities by decision curve analysis. Results: There were 139 patients (32.6%) with benign LNs, 110 patients (25.8%) with lymphoma, and 177 patients (41.5%) with metastatic LNs in our population. Finally, twenty features were selected to construct the radiomics models for these three types of lymphadenopathy. Model 2 integrating multiphase images of the CEUS yielded the AUCs of 0.838, 0.739, and 0.733 in the training cohort, internal testing cohort, and external testing cohort, respectively. After the combination of conventional features and radiomic features, the AUCs of model 3 improved to 0.943, 0.823 and 0.785 in the training cohort, internal testing cohort, and external testing cohort. Besides, model 3 had an accuracy of 81.05%, sensitivity of 80%, and specificity of 90.43% in the training cohort. Model performance was further confirmed in the internal testing cohort and external testing cohort. Conclusions: We constructed a combined feature model using a series of CEUS images for the classification of the lymphadenopathies. For patients with superficial suspected LNs, this model can help clinicians make a decision on the LN type noninvasively and choose appropriate treatments.

Indexed as

classificationContrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)lymph nodes (LNs)radiomics

Identifiers

PMID38415137
PMCPMC10895124
OpenAlexW4391258634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.