ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Deep learning-based bronchial tree-guided semi-automatic segmentation of pulmonary segments in computed tomography images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary segments are valuable because they can provide more precise localization and intricate details of lung cancer than lung lobes. With advances in precision therapy, there is an increasing demand for the identification and visualization of pulmonary segments in computed tomography (CT) images to aid in the precise treatment of lung cancer. This study aimed to integrate multiple deep-learning models to accurately segment pulmonary segments in CT images using a bronchial tree (BT)-based approach. Methods: The proposed segmentation method for pulmonary segments using the BT-based approach comprised the following five essential steps: (I) segmentation of the lung using a U-Net (R231) (public access) model; (II) segmentation of the lobes using a V-Net (self-developed) model; (III) segmentation of the airway using a combination of a differential geometric approach method and a BronchiNet (public access) model; (IV) labeling of the BT branches based on anatomical position; and (V) segmentation of the pulmonary segments based on the distance of each voxel to the labeled BT branches. This five-step process was applied to 14 high-resolution breath-hold CT images and compared against manual segmentations for evaluation. Results: For the lung segmentation, the lung mask had a mean dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.98±0.03. For the lobe segmentation, the V-Net model had a mean DSC of 0.94±0.06. For the airway segmentation, the average total length of the segmented airway trees per image scan was 1,902.8±502.1 mm, and the average number of the maximum airway tree generations was 8.5±1.3. For the segmentation of the pulmonary segments, the proposed method had a DSC of 0.73±0.11 and a mean surface distance of 6.1±2.9 mm. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of combining multiple deep-learning models for the auxiliary segmentation of pulmonary segments on CT images using a BT-based approach. The results highlighted the potential of the BT-based method for the semi-automatic segmentation of the pulmonary segment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.