ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Ability of the European League Against Rheumatism-Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology combined scoring system for grading dorsal joint space synovitis to accurately evaluate ultrasound-detected hand synovitis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vision transformer-based ordinal model for semi-quantitative synovitis grading on musculoskeletal ultrasound: a retrospective study with internal and external validation.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Early and Mid-Term Ultrasound Response to Guselkumab in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Real-World Cohort from a Single Tertiary Rheumatology Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The European League Against Rheumatism-Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology (EULAR-OMERACT) recommend only scanning dorsal spaces for scoring ultrasound-detected hand synovitis. This study evaluated the efficiency of the combined scoring system only depending on dorsal joint spaces synovitis in diagnosing and evaluating ultrasound-detected hand synovitis. Methods: The data of 56 patients who underwent hand joint ultrasonography exams in the Ultrasound Department of West China Hospital, Sichuan University were prospectively collected. The participants formed a random series. The images of each patient included gray-scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) images of bilateral first to fifth metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP) and the thumb and second to fifth proximal interphalangeal joints (IP). The synovial thickness was measured quantitatively in GS images, and the synovial GS scores in the dorsal joint spaces and PD scores in the dorsal and volar joint spaces were calculated according to the combined EULAR-OMERACT scoring system. Results: The detection rate of synovitis in the first to fifth MCP, thumb and second to fifth proximal IP synovitis were 41.4% (232/560) and 33.9% (190/560), respectively. The sensitivity of only inspecting the dorsal joint spaces with GS ultrasound was 79.3% for MCP and 52.6% for the thumb and second to fifth proximal IPs. The PD scores were higher in the dorsal joint spaces than in the volar joint spaces (P value <0.001). The combined scores were higher than either the GS or PD scores alone in the dorsal joint spaces (P value of the combined scores Conclusions: Adopting the EULAR-OMERACT combined scoring standard is recommended to evaluate ultrasound-detected hand synovitis, as determined by the highest value of the GS scores or the PD scores. More specifically, PD scores can mainly be used to appraise the dorsal joint spaces. However, GS scores should be used to evaluate both the dorsal joint spaces and the volar joint spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.