ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
A two-step neural network-based guiding system for obtaining reliable radiographs for critical shoulder angle measurement.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The critical shoulder angle (CSA) has been reported to be highly associated with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and an increased risk of RCT re-tears. However, the measurement of the CSA is greatly affected by the malpositioning of the shoulder. To address this issue, a two-step neural network-based guiding system was developed to obtain reliable CSA radiographs, and its feasibility and accuracy was evaluated. Methods: A total of 1,754 shoulder anteroposterior (AP) radiographs were retrospectively acquired to train and validate a two-step neural network-based guiding system to obtain reliable CSA radiographs. The study included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent X-rays and/or computed tomography (CT) scans of the shoulder. Patients who had undergone shoulder surgery, had a confirmed fracture, or were diagnosed with a musculoskeletal tumor or glenoid defect were excluded from the study. The system consisted of a two-step neural network that in the first step, localized the region of interest of the shoulder, and in the second step, classified the radiography according to type [i.e., 'forward' when the non-overlapping coracoid process is above the glenoid rim, 'backward' when the non-overlapping coracoid process is below or aligned with the glenoid rim, a ratio of the transverse to longitudinal diameter of the glenoid projection (RTL) ≤0.25, or a RTL >0.25]. The performance of the model was assessed in an offline, prospective manner, focusing on the sensitivity and specificity for the forward, backward, RTL ≤0.25, or RTL >0.25 types (denoted as Sens Results: Of 273 cases in the offline prospective test, the Sens Conclusions: The guiding system can rapidly and accurately classify the types of AP shoulder radiography, thereby guiding the adjustment of patient positioning. This will facilitate the rapid obtainment of reliable CSA radiography to measure the CSA on proper AP radiographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.