Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38415041›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2023

Bone augmentation in dental implants among Indian patients.

Akshayraj Langaliya, Pravin Uttam Gaikwad, Tarun Kumar Singh, Washim Akram, Vineet Nair, Prajakta Barapatre, Hitika P Doda, Dhaval Niranjan Mehta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Akshayraj LangaliyaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, AMC Dental College and Hospital, Gujarat, India.
Pravin Uttam GaikwadDepartment of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, M.A. Rangoonwala College of dental sciences and research Centre, Pune, India.
Tarun Kumar SinghDepartment of Dentistry, AIIMS, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Washim AkramDepartment of Dentistry, Raiganj Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India.
Vineet NairDepartment of Periodontology, Dr. R Ahmed Dental College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Prajakta BarapatreDepartment of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, Mahatma Gandhi Dental College & Hospital, Jaipur, India.
Hitika P DodaMidtown Dental GroupUnited States.
Dhaval Niranjan MehtaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Narsinbhai Patel Dental college and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is of interest to compare guided bone regeneration (GBR) with titanium mesh, alveolar distraction osteo-genesis (DO), GBR with auto-genous bone and e-PTFE membranes and onlay bone grafts. This helps to restore vertically lacking alveolar ridges and their capacity to sustain the vertical bone growth acquired both prior to and following implant placement. The parameters such as (i) success and survival of dental implants (ii) peri-implant clinical parameters after prosthetic loading at 1 year, 2 year and 3 year follow up (iii) resorption of alveolar ridge regenerated before placement of dental implants and after placement of dental implants were assessed. Data shows that the distraction osteo-genesis is more predictable for long-term prognosis of vertical bone growth. However, all methods help to repair the vertically resorbed edentulous ridges.

Indexed as

autologous bone graftsBone augmentationdental implantse-PTTExeno-graphic titanium mess

Identifiers

PMID38415041
PMCPMC10895528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.