Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38414924›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Effect of on-pump vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with non-dialysis-dependent severe renal impairment: propensity-matched analysis from the UK registry dataset.

Daniel P Fudulu, Amerikos Argyriou, Rahul Kota, Jeremy Chan, Hunaid Vohra, Massimo Caputo, Mustafa Zakkar, Gianni D Angelini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel P FuduluDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Amerikos ArgyriouDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rahul KotaBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jeremy ChanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Hunaid VohraDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Massimo CaputoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Mustafa ZakkarDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Gianni D AngeliniDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/17/1/32804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: On-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCABG) grafting in patients with a pre-existing poor renal reserve is known to carry significant morbidity and mortality. There is limited controversial evidence on the benefit of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCABG) grafting in these high-risk groups of patients. We compared early clinical outcomes in propensity-matched cohorts of patients with non-dialysis-dependent pre-operative severe renal impairment undergoing OPCABG vs. ONCABG, captured in a large national registry dataset. Methods: All data for patients with a pre-operative creatinine clearance of less than 50 mL/min who underwent elective or urgent isolated OPCABG or ONCABG from 1996 to 2019 were extracted from the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit (NACSA) database. Propensity score matching was performed using 1:1 nearest neighbor matching without replacement using several baseline characteristics. We investigated the effect of ONCABG vs. OPCABG in the matched cohort using cluster-robust standard error regression. Results: We identified 8,628 patients with severe renal impairment undergoing isolated CABG, of whom 1,142 (13.23%) underwent OPCABG during the study period. We compared 1,141 propensity-matched pairs of patients undergoing OPCABG vs. ONCABG. The median age of the matched population was 78 years in both groups, with no significant imbalance post-matching in the rest of the variables. There was no difference between OPCABG and ONCABG in in-hospital mortality rates, post-operative dialysis, and stroke rates. However, the return to theatre for bleeding or tamponade was higher in ONCABG vs. OPCABG ( Discussion: In this propensity analysis of a large national registry dataset, we found no difference in early mortality and stroke in patients with pre-operative severe renal impairment undergoing OPCABG or ONCABG surgery; however, ONCABG was associated with an increased risk of return to theatre for bleeding and an increased length of hospital stay.

Indexed as

coronary artery bypass graftingcoronary diseaseoff-pump coronary artery bypass graftingoutcomesrenal dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID38414924
PMCPMC10897021
OpenAlexW4391784695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.