ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2024
Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening and Its Barriers Using Health Belief Model Among Health Professionals Working in Public Hospitals in South Gondar Zone, Northcentral Ethiopia: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cervical cancer screening utilization among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring primary health care nurses' perceptions of cervical cancer screening in Leribe, Lesotho.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to cervical cancer screening utilization among female healthcare professionals in the Tamale Metropolis.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer is a malignant neoplasm that originates in the cervix, and it is a leading cause of mortality, with 270,000 deaths every year globally. Of these, 85% occur in developing countries, including Ethiopia. Routine cervical cancer screening and early treatment can prevent up to 80% of cervical cancers. Health professionals are expected to screen for and be screened for cervical cancer. However, there is limited information about the uptake of cervical cancer screening among health professionals in the study area. Objective: This study aimed to determine the magnitude of cervical cancer screening uptake and identify its barriers among health professionals. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study design was conducted among health professionals from December 01 to 30, 2022. A total of 164 respondents were included in the study, and simple random sampling was used to select the respondents. Variables with a Results: Of the total respondents, 112 (68.3%) were younger than the age of 30 years, with a mean age of 29.4 years ranging from 21 to 45 years. Seventy-nine of the respondents (48.2%) have work experience of 6-10 years, and 103 (62.8%) are nurses in profession. In this study, the magnitude of cervical cancer screening uptake was 28.1% (95% CI: 27.7%-35.6%). Moreover, attitude (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.1-5.1), age at first sexual intercourse (AOR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3-3.4), having history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs; AOR = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.5-11.6), knowing someone who had been screened (AOR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.8-4.8), and cervical cancer screening training (AOR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.9) were significantly associated with cervical cancer screening. Conclusion: Generally, this study reported that the magnitude of cervical cancer screening uptake was low. The study also indicated that attitude, age at first sexual intercourse, history of STIs, knowing someone who had been screened, and training of cervical cancer screening were independent predictors of uptake of cervical cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.