Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38414831›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2024

Qualitative assessment of expectations on the content, form and way of delivery of a prehabilitation programme in patients with lung resection surgery - A Swiss tertiary centre experience.

Prisca Eser, Colette Klaus, Thomas Vetsch, Raphaela Ernst, Dominique Engel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prisca EserRehabilitation & Sports Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-0682
Colette KlausRehabilitation & Sports Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas VetschDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Raphaela ErnstRehabilitation & Sports Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dominique EngelDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the interest in a prehabilitation programme of patients awaiting lung resection and to identify expectations from such a programme. Introduction: At present, in Switzerland, there are no multimodal clinical prehabilitation programmes for lung resection patients awaiting surgery. Methods: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with patients who have had or were awaiting lung resection at a Swiss tertiary centre. Thematic analysis was performed to identify common prespecified themes. Results: Twenty-two patients (45.5% female, age 70.6 ± 16.6 years) were interviewed. Seventy-seven percent were interested in a prehabilitation programme. Sixty-two percent, 67% and 90% were interested in endurance, strength and respiratory training, respectively. Six patients (27%) were active smokers, of whom two (one-third) were interested in a smoking cessation programme. Seventy-six percent were interested in nutrition counselling and 90% in receiving education on risk factor management. Forty percent preferred centre-based training/counselling sessions, 20% preferred home-based training/counselling and 30% found both forms acceptable. Patients were willing to perform prehabilitation activities on 2.6 days/week for a total of 162 min/week. Participating in peer groups was desired by only 25%. Conclusions: Patients with lung resection were highly interested in participating in prehabilitation, albeit only for a mean time cost of 2.7 h per week. Offering a prehabilitation programme with a combination of in-hospital group sessions and home-based training seems feasible.

Indexed as

exercisenon-small cell lung cancerpatient educationpatient involvementprehabilitationrespiratory trainingSemi-structured interviewssmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID38414831
PMCPMC10898307
OpenAlexW4392157655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.