ArticleFrontiers in digital health2023
Electronic medical record systems data use in decision-making and associated factors among health managers at public primary health facilities, Dodoma region: a cross-sectional analytical study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning for risk stratification of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Enhancing clinical efficiency in low-resource antenatal care in Tanzania.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- The relationship between self-awareness skills of healthcare workers and healthcare data quality: a cross-sectional study in Tanzanian regional referral hospitals.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Oncology Care Delivery in Sub-Saharan Africa.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- Time Burden of Electronic Medical Records on Nurses and Physicians in Saudi Arabia: Occurrence, Predictors, and Challenges-A Mixed-Methods Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Localizing WHO SMART guidelines-Digital Adaptation Kits (DAKs) for country impact: implementation insights from Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Zambia.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
- Electronic medical record-generated data use for decision-making and associated factors among healthcare managers in Somali public health facilities: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Predictive power of socio-demographic attributes of healthcare workers on data quality in Tanzanian regional referral hospitals.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of care and clinical outcomes after the implementation of an electronic medical record system for type 1 diabetes management in Rwanda.Global health action · 2025Article
- Assessing electronic medical record usage in private healthcare facilities of Amhara region, Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nursing informatics competence and its associated factors among nurses in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Applying PEST analysis to evaluate the adoption of electronic health records in Tanzanian healthcare: A scoping review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tanzania has shown some improvements in the adoption of electronic medical record (EMR) systems in public health facilities; however, the rate of utilization of data generated from EMRs among health managers is not well documented. This study aims to assess the use of electronic medical record systems data in decision-making among health managers at public primary health facilities in Dodoma Region, Central Tanzania. Methods: A facility-based quantitative cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 308 randomly selected health managers. A self-administered questionnaire supplemented with documentary review was used. Descriptive summary statistics and bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses (crude and adjusted odds ratios) were used. A Results: Overall, more than a third (40.6%) of the health managers, that is 174 of the 308 included in the study, reported using data generated by EMR systems in decision-making. One-third (33.4%) of the health managers were adequately using data generated by EMR systems, of which 39.3% used data to support continuous quality improvement initiatives. Among the facilities visited, only nine (30%) had good documented EMR systems data use. Access to computers [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 4.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65, 13.48, Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that utilization of EMR system data in decision-making among health managers was optimal. It was found that training in itself is insufficient to improve use of EMR, which points to more organizational aspects of work routine as a challenge. Hence, a comprehensive approach that addresses these factors is essential for maximizing EMR system data use in decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.