Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38414715›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2024

Eliciting perspectives on remote healthcare delivery from service users with psychosis in the community: a cross-sectional survey study.

Ronja Kuhn, Nadia Abdel-Halim, Patrick Healey, Victoria Bird, Kathryn Elliot, Philip McNamee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ronja KuhnUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatry & Mental Health, Wolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Nadia Abdel-HalimUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Patrick HealeySchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Victoria BirdUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatry & Mental Health, Wolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Kathryn ElliotUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatry & Mental Health, Wolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Philip McNameeUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Queen Mary University of London · GBEast London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The transition towards remote healthcare has been rapidly accelerated in recent years due to a number of factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic, however, few studies have explored service users' views of remote mental healthcare, particularly in community mental health settings. Methods: As part of a larger study concerned with the development of a remotely delivered psychosocial intervention, a survey was conducted with service users with psychosis ( Results: The majority of service users had access to technological devices and a quiet space to receive care. Age was a key factor in motivation to engage with remote care as older participants had less access to technological devices and the internet, and reported less confidence to learn how to use new technologies compared to younger participants. Differences in access and attitudes towards remote care were found across the different geographical localities. Over half of the participants (53.1%) preferred a hybrid model (i.e., mixture of face-to-face and remotely delivered treatment), with only 4.5% preferring remote treatment exclusively. Factors that both encourage and deter service users from engaging with remote care were identified. Conclusions: The findings of this study provide important information about the environmental and clinical barriers that prevent, or limit, the uptake of remotely delivered care for people with psychotic disorders. Although service users often have the ability and capacity to receive remote care, providers need to be cognisant of factors which may exacerbate digital exclusion and negatively impact the therapeutic alliance.

Indexed as

digital exclusionpsychosisremote healthcaresurveytechnology

Identifiers

PMID38414715
PMCPMC10897019
OpenAlexW4391783776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.