ArticleCureus2024
Patients With Atypical Chest Pain: Epidemiology and Reported Consequences.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A nomogram to distinguish noncardiac chest pain based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing in cardiology clinic.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApproximately a quarter of the global population experiences chest pain during their lifetime worldwide. Although largely non-life-threatening, many patients experience mental, physical, social, and financial consequences.
aimThis study aimed to describe and determine the epidemiology and consequences of patients presenting with atypical chest pain (ACP). Method: Data were obtained from 102 participants, from a desired sample size of 166. The target population was patients who presented with ACP at the Accident and Emergency Department of a Teaching Hospital in Trinidad during a two-year period, from January 2021 to December 2022. The data collection instrument used was a 34-item online questionnaire. Data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistical methods.
resultsParticipants were predominantly women (63.7%; n = 65), between 31 and 50 years of age (74.5%; n = 76), in full-time employment (n = 58; 56.9%), who lived with at least one person (90.2%; n = 92) at the time of the episode. Overall, 61.8% (n = 63) reported having a stressful life. Hypertension (30.4%; n = 31) and diabetes (18.6%; n = 19) were the leading comorbidities. Participants experienced mild to severe anxiety (53.9%; n = 55), moderate to severe depression (25.5%; n = 26), moderate stress (65.7%; n = 67), and loneliness (25.5%; n = 26). A stressful life was associated with, and was a predictor of, both anxiety and loneliness. No sociodemographic variables were associated with depression or stress. The most common self-reported consequences were "fear as a result of the pain" (68.6%; n = 69), "interruptions to daily life" (60.8%; n = 61), "reduction in time spent on hobbies" (62.7%; n = 63), and costly diagnostic/investigative tests (62.7%; n = 64). The majority of patients (52.9%; n = 53) reported reduced quality of life. The most common treatment prescribed was paracetamol (53.9%; n = 55) and exercise (23.5%; n = 24).
conclusionThe study participants were mainly women, 31-50 years old, who had experienced anxiety, stress, or depression. They mainly experienced fear and self-reported a reduced quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.