ArticleCureus2024
Examining Postoperative Posterior Cruciate Ligament Index: A Structural Paradigm in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstructions With Hamstring Tendon Autograft.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current study aimed to compare the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) index values of patients who underwent hamstring tendon (HT) autograft reconstruction due to an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. The comparison involved assessing these values in a similar cohort and evaluating the association between the alteration in the PCL index and functional results.
methodsPatients who were clinically diagnosed with a complete, unilateral ACL tear and underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using HT autograft between January 2018 and January 2021 constituted the operated group (Group 1) of the study. The control group (Group 2) consisted of patients selected from a convenience sample without ACL rupture, meniscal lesion, or cartilage damage who underwent an MRI during an outpatient orthopaedic consultation for knee pain. The operated group was submitted for an MRI of the knee one year after the operation for any reason such as pain, graft healing, the presence of tunnel widening, or suspicion of re-rupture. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form and the Lysholm Scoring System were applied to the patients in the operated group in the preoperative and postoperative periods to evaluate their complaints, function, and participation in sports and to assess functional ability and functional capacity. A radiologist with five years of experience measured the PCL index in the sagittal section of an MRI. In the operated group, changes in PCL index, IKDC, and Lysholm values during the postoperative period were assessed, along with their correlation. Additionally, a comparison was made between the values of the operated group and the non-operated group.
resultsNo statistically significant correlation was found between the PCL index alteration and the functional score alteration (IKDC and Lysholm) in the operated group (p>0.05). In comparison to the non-operated group, the preoperative PCL index measures of the operated group were significantly lower (p: 0.000; p<0.05). The increase in the postoperative PCL index measurements of the operated group was similarly statistically significant (p: 0.000; p<0.05).
conclusionAlthough the PCL index appears to be a strong anatomical structural parameter in ACLR patients performing HT autograft in the postoperative period, its correlation with functional results is weak.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.