Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38414545›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2023

Machine learning models in trusted research environments - understanding operational risks.

Felix Ritchie, Amy Tilbrook, Christian Cole, Emily Jefferson, Susan Krueger, Esma Mansouri-Benssassi, Simon Rogers, Jim Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Extent of Open Science Practices in the Reporting of Real World Evidence Research.International journal of population data science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Felix RitchieBristol Business School, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY.
Amy TilbrookUniversity of Edinburgh, South Bridge, Edinburgh EH8 9YL.
Christian ColeDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.
Emily JeffersonDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.
Susan KruegerHealth Informatics Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.
Esma Mansouri-BenssassiAffectiveHalo Ltd, Tom Morris Drive, St Andrews.KY16 8HS.
Simon RogersNHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh EH12 9EB.
Jim SmithSchool of Computer Science and Creative Technologies, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21005Medical Research Council MC_PC_21033Medical Research Council MC_PC_23006Medical Research Council MR/S010351/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Trusted research environments (TREs) provide secure access to very sensitive data for research. All TREs operate manual checks on outputs to ensure there is no residual disclosure risk. Machine learning (ML) models require very large amount of data; if this data is personal, the TRE is a well-established data management solution. However, ML models present novel disclosure risks, in both type and scale. Objectives: As part of a series on ML disclosure risk in TREs, this article is intended to introduce TRE managers to the conceptual problems and work being done to address them. Methods: We demonstrate how ML models present a qualitatively different type of disclosure risk, compared to traditional statistical outputs. These arise from both the nature and the scale of ML modelling. Results: We show that there are a large number of unresolved issues, although there is progress in many areas. We show where areas of uncertainty remain, as well as remedial responses available to TREs. Conclusions: At this stage, disclosure checking of ML models is very much a specialist activity. However, TRE managers need a basic awareness of the potential risk in ML models to enable them to make sensible decisions on using TREs for ML model development.

Indexed as

DisclosureMachine Learningartificial intelligenceconfidentialitydata enclavemachine learningoutput checkingtrusted research environment

Identifiers

PMID38414545
PMCPMC10898318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.