Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38414540›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2023

Identification of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major and clinically relevant non-major bleed events from electronic health records: a novel algorithm to enhance data utilisation from real-world sources.

Alexander Hartenstein, Khaled Abdelgawwad, Frank Kleinjung, Stephen Privitera, Thomas Viethen, Tatsiana Vaitsiakhovich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Natural Language Processing andJMIR medical informatics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Expert Opinion on Implementing Oral Anticoagulation Reversal Protocols in US Hospitals.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander HartensteinMedical Affairs and Pharmacovigilance, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Khaled AbdelgawwadMedical Affairs and Pharmacovigilance, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Frank KleinjungMedical Affairs and Pharmacovigilance, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Stephen PriviteraMedical Affairs and Pharmacovigilance, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas ViethenResearch and Development, Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany.
Tatsiana VaitsiakhovichMedical Affairs and Pharmacovigilance, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Bayer (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In randomised controlled trials (RCTs), bleeding outcomes are often assessed using definitions provided by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). Information relating to bleeding events in real-world evidence (RWE) sources are not identified using these definitions. To assist with accurate comparisons between clinical trials and real-world studies, algorithms are required for the identification of ISTH-defined bleeding events in RWE sources. Objectives: To present a novel algorithm to identify ISTH-defined major and clinically-relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding events in a US Electronic Health Record (EHR) database. Methods: The ISTH definition for major bleeding was divided into three subclauses: fatal bleeds, critical organ bleeds and symptomatic bleeds associated with haemoglobin reductions. Data elements from EHRs required to identify patients fulfilling these subclauses (algorithm components) were defined according to International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions, Clinical Modification disease codes that describe key bleeding events. Other data providing context to bleeding severity included in the algorithm were: 'interaction type' (diagnosis in the inpatient or outpatient setting), 'position' (primary/discharge or secondary diagnosis), haemoglobin values from laboratory tests, blood transfusion codes and mortality data. Results: In the final algorithm, the components were combined to align with the subclauses of ISTH definitions for major and CRNM bleeds. A matrix was proposed to guide identification of ISTH bleeding events in the EHR database. The matrix categorises bleeding events by combining data from algorithm components, including: diagnosis codes, 'interaction type', 'position', decreases in haemoglobin concentrations ( Conclusions: The novel algorithm proposed here identifies ISTH major and CRNM bleeding events that are commonly investigated in RCTs in a real-world EHR data source. This algorithm could facilitate comparison between the frequency of bleeding outcomes recorded in clinical trials and RWE. Validation of algorithm performance is in progress.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsThrombosisAlgorithmsHemoglobinsHemorrhageHemostasisHumansHemoglobinsalgorithmselectronic health recordshemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID38414540
PMCPMC10898215
OpenAlexW4387254545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.