Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38414528›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2024

Natural Products-Based Inhaled Formulations for Treating Pulmonary Diseases.

Jiangyan Yong, Hongli Shu, Xiao Zhang, Kun Yang, Guining Luo, Lu Yu, Jiaqi Li, Hong Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. TFR1 as a Biomarker of Pulmonary Fibrosis Development in COPD Patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiangyan Yong *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610072, People's Republic of China.
Hongli Shu *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610072, People's Republic of China.
Xiao Zhang *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Chengdu Children Special Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610031, People's Republic of China.
Kun YangChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611137, People's Republic of China.
Guining LuoChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611137, People's Republic of China.
Lu YuChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611137, People's Republic of China.
Jiaqi LiChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611137, People's Republic of China.
Hong HuangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, the People's Hospital of Chongqing Liang Jiang New Area, Chongqing, 401121, People's Republic of China.
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital · CNFirst People's Hospital of Chongqing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the unique physiological and pathological characteristics of the lung, the direct, inhalable route is more conducive to pulmonary drug delivery and disease control than traditional systemic drug delivery, significantly circumventing drug loss, off-target effects, systemic and organ toxicity, etc., and is widely regarded as the preferred regimen for pulmonary drug delivery. However, very few lung diseases are currently treated with the preferred inhaled formulations, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary hypertension. And there is a lack of appropriate inhaled formulations for other critical lung diseases, such as lung cancer and pulmonary fibrosis, due to the fact that the physicochemical properties of the drugs and their pharmacokinetic profiles do not match the physiology of the lung, and conventional inhalation devices are unable to deliver them to the specific parts of the lung. Phytochemicals of natural origin, due to their wide availability and clear safety profile, hold great promise for the preparation of inhalable formulations to improve the current dilemma in the treatment of lung diseases. In particular, the preparation of inhalable formulations based on nano- and microparticulate carriers for drug delivery to deep lung tissues, which overcome the shortcomings of conventional inhalation therapies while targeting the drug activity directly to a specific part of the lung, may be the best approach to change the current dilemma of lung disease treatment. In this review, we discuss recent advances in nano- and micron-carrier-based inhalation formulations for the delivery of natural products for the treatment of pulmonary diseases, which may represent an opportunity for practical clinical translation of natural products.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsLung DiseasesAdministration, InhalationDrug Delivery SystemsHumansLungPharmaceutical PreparationsBiological ProductsPharmaceutical Preparationsinhalation therapyinhaled nanoformulationsnanomedicinenatural productspulmonary diseases

Identifiers

PMID38414528
PMCPMC10898359
OpenAlexW4392078386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.