Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38414120›Full record

ReviewAnnals of coloproctology2024

Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minsung KimDepartment of Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.
Taeyong ParkMedical Artificial Intelligence Center, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang, Korea.
Bo Young OhDepartment of Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.
Min Jeong KimDepartment of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.
Bum-Joo ChoMedical Artificial Intelligence Center, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang, Korea.
Il Tae SonDepartment of Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRHallym University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy by identifying subtle patterns and aiding tumor delineation and lymph node assessment. According to our systematic review focusing on convolutional neural networks, AI-driven tumor staging and the prediction of treatment response facilitate tailored treat-ment strategies for patients with rectal cancer.

methodsThis paper summarizes the current landscape of AI in the imaging field of rectal cancer, emphasizing the performance reporting design based on the quality of the dataset, model performance, and external validation.

resultsAI-driven tumor segmentation has demonstrated promising results using various convolutional neural network models. AI-based predictions of staging and treatment response have exhibited potential as auxiliary tools for personalized treatment strategies. Some studies have indicated superior performance than conventional models in predicting microsatellite instability and KRAS status, offer-ing noninvasive and cost-effective alternatives for identifying genetic mutations.

conclusionImage-based AI studies for rectal can-cer have shown acceptable diagnostic performance but face several challenges, including limited dataset sizes with standardized data, the need for multicenter studies, and the absence of oncologic relevance and external validation for clinical implantation. Overcoming these pitfalls and hurdles is essential for the feasible integration of AI models in clinical settings for rectal cancer, warranting further research.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38414120
PMCPMC10915525
OpenAlexW4392236305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.