Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38414087›Full record

Trial reportBMC pharmacology & toxicology2024

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of two oral formulations of cotrimoxazole tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting conditions.

Xu Zuo, Xin Zhao, Jinjin Shi, Tiandong Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xu ZuoPhase I clinical trial research laboratory, Xinxiang central hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Xin ZhaoPhase I clinical trial research laboratory, Xinxiang central hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Jinjin ShiPhase I clinical trial research laboratory, Xinxiang central hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Tiandong ZhangPhase I clinical trial research laboratory, Xinxiang central hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China. tiandongzhang_xx@163.com.
Xinxiang Central Hospital · CNXinxiang Medical University · CN

Funding

Henan Province Medical Science and Technology Tackling Program Joint Co-Construction Project LHGJ20191332Henan Province Medical Science and Technology Tackling Program Joint Co-Construction Project LHGJ 20230881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This bioequivalence study was conducted to evaluate two oral formulations of cotrimoxazole tablets in healthy Chinese subjects. All 26 subjects recruited to this study were randomly and evenly classified into two groups and received a single dose (sulfamethoxazole: 400 mg and trimethoprim: 80 mg) of test cotrimoxazole tablets (generic drug) or reference cotrimoxazole tablets (branded drug). After a 7-day washout period, these subjects received one dose of reference drug or test drug. Blood samples were collected from participants before and up to 48 h after dosing to assess the concentration of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and trimethoprim (TMP) in plasma and a plasma concentration-time curve was drawn. Then, the pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated accordingly. Our data revealed that there were no significant differences observed in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and area under the curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) between the two formulations. For SMX, the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric mean ratio for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 104.03-113.92%, 100.46-103.70%, and 100.41-103.81%, respectively. Similarly, for Trimethoprim (TMP), the 90% CI ranged from 98.54 to 106.95% for Cmax, from 99.31 to 107.68% for AUC0-t, and from 99.49 to 107.55% for AUC0-∞. Importantly, all these 90% CI values fell within the range of 80.00-125.00%, indicating that the test drug is bioequivalent to the reference drug. Furthermore, throughout the entire trial, no suspected serious adverse events were reported, indicating the safety profile of the newly developed generic cotrimoxazole. In summary, our study demonstrates that the newly developed generic formulation of cotrimoxazole is bioequivalent to the branded formulation under fasting conditions.

Indexed as

FastingTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationArea Under CurveChinaCross-Over StudiesHealthy VolunteersHumansTabletsTherapeutic EquivalencyTabletsTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationBioequivalenceCotrimoxazolePharmacokineticsSafety

Identifiers

PMID38414087
PMCPMC10900551
OpenAlexW4392186052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.