Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413921›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2024

How using light touch immersion research revealed important insights into the lack of progress in malaria elimination in Eastern Indonesia.

Dee Jupp, Sherria Ayuandini, Frisca Tobing, Denny Halim, Enny Kenangalem, Maria E Sumiwi, Hellen D Prameswari, Minerva Theodora, Hermawan Susanto, Riskha T P Dewi and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perceptions and Acceptability ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dee JuppEMPATIKA, Jakarta, Indonesia. dee.jupp@btinternet.com.
Sherria AyuandiniEMPATIKA, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Frisca TobingEMPATIKA, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Denny HalimEMPATIKA, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Enny KenangalemEMPATIKA, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Maria E SumiwiMinistry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Hellen D PrameswariMinistry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Minerva TheodoraMinistry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Hermawan SusantoMinistry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Riskha T P DewiMinistry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Dedy SupriyantoMinistry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Bayu KurniaMinistry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Mrunal ShetyeUNICEF Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ermi NdoenUNICEF Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. endoen@unicef.org.
Yuka OnishiUNICEF Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ministry of Health · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBy 2022, the Government of Indonesia had successfully eliminated malaria in 389 out of 514 districts but continues to face a challenge in Eastern Indonesia where 95% of the total 2021 malaria cases were reported from Papua, West Papua and Nusa Tenggara Timur provinces. There is an increased recognition that malaria elimination will require a better understanding of the human behavioural factors hindering malaria prevention and treatment, informed by local context and local practice.

methodsThis research used a light-touch immersion research approach. Field researchers lived in communities over several days to gather data through informal conversations, group-based discussions using visual tools, participant observation and direct experience. The study was conducted in four high malaria endemic areas in Papua, West Papua, and Sumba Islands in Nusa Tenggara Timur.

resultsThe research highlights how people's perception of malaria has changed since the introduction of effective treatment which, in turn, has contributed to a casual attitude towards early testing and adherence to malaria treatment. It also confirms that people rarely accept there is a link between mosquitoes and malaria based on their experience but nevertheless take precautions against the annoyance of mosquitoes. There is widespread recognition that babies and small children, elderly and incomers are more likely to be seriously affected by malaria and separately, more troubled by mosquitoes than indigenous adult populations. This is primarily explained by acclimatization and strong immune systems among the latter.

conclusionsUsing immersion research enabled behaviour research within a naturalistic setting, which in turn enabled experiential-led analysis of findings and revealed previously unrecognized insights into attitudes towards malaria in Eastern Indonesia. The research provides explanations of people's lack of motivation to consistently use bed nets, seek early diagnosis or complete courses of treatment. The felt concern for the wellbeing of vulnerable populations highlighted during light touch immersion provides an entry point for future social behaviour change communication interventions. Rather than trying to explain transmission to people who deny this connection, the research concludes that it may be better to focus separately on the two problems of malaria and mosquitoes (especially for vulnerable groups) thereby resonating with local people's own experience and felt concerns.

Indexed as

CulicidaeMalariaAdultAgedAnimalsChildHumansImmersionIndonesiaBehavior changeImmersion researchMalariaNusa Tenggara TimurPapuaRisk perceptionSocial determinantsSumba

Identifiers

PMID38413921
PMCPMC10898039
OpenAlexW4392198373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.