Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413911›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2024

Inequity in the face of success: understanding geographic and wealth-based equity in success of facility-based delivery for under-5 mortality reduction in six countries.

Jovial Thomas Ntawukuriryayo, Amelia VanderZanden, Alemayehu Amberbir, Alula Teklu, Fauzia Akhter Huda, Mahesh Maskey, Mohamadou Sall, Patricia J Garcia, Raj Kumar Subedi, Felix Sayinzoga and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jovial Thomas NtawukuriryayoUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda. tntawukuriryayo@ughe.org.
Amelia VanderZandenUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6984-2132
Alemayehu AmberbirUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.
Alula TekluMERQ Consultancy PLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Fauzia Akhter HudaMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mahesh MaskeyNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Mohamadou SallThe Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal.
Patricia J GarciaSchool of Public Health at Cayetano, Heredia University, Lima, Peru.
Raj Kumar SubediNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Felix SayinzogaRwanda Biomedical Center, Maternal, Child, and Community Health Division, Kigali, Rwanda.
Lisa R HirschhornUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.
Agnes BinagwahoUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1191491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetween 2000-2015, many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) implemented evidence-based interventions (EBIs) known to reduce under-5 mortality (U5M). Even among LMICs successful in reducing U5M, this drop was unequal subnationally, with varying success in EBI implementation. Building on mixed methods multi-case studies of six LMICs (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Nepal, Peru, Rwanda, and Senegal) leading in U5M reduction, we describe geographic and wealth-based equity in facility-based delivery (FBD), a critical EBI to reduce neonatal mortality which requires a trusted and functional health system, and compare the implementation strategies and contextual factors which influenced success or challenges within and across the countries.

methodsTo obtain equity gaps in FBD coverage and changes in absolute geographic and wealth-based equity between 2000-2015, we calculated the difference between the highest and lowest FBD coverage across subnational regions and in the FBD coverage between the richest and poorest wealth quintiles. We extracted and compared contextual factors and implementation strategies associated with reduced or remaining inequities from the country case studies.

resultsThe absolute geographic and wealth-based equity gaps decreased in three countries, with greatest drops in Rwanda - decreasing from 50 to 5% across subnational regions and from 43 to 13% across wealth quintiles. The largest increases were seen in Bangladesh - from 10 to 32% across geography - and in Ethiopia - from 22 to 58% across wealth quintiles. Facilitators to reducing equity gaps across the six countries included leadership commitment and culture of data use; in some countries, community or maternal and child health insurance was also an important factor (Rwanda and Peru). Barriers across all the countries included geography, while country-specific barriers included low female empowerment subnationally (Bangladesh) and cultural beliefs (Ethiopia). Successful strategies included building on community health worker (CHW) programs, with country-specific adaptation of pre-existing CHW programs (Rwanda, Ethiopia, and Senegal) and cultural adaptation of delivery protocols (Peru). Reducing delivery costs was successful in Senegal, and partially successful in Nepal and Ethiopia.

conclusionVariable success in reducing inequity in FBD coverage among countries successful in reducing U5M underscores the importance of measuring not just coverage but also equity. Learning from FBD interventions shows the need to prioritize equity in access and uptake of EBIs for the poor and in remote areas by adapting the strategies to local context.

Indexed as

Child HealthInfant MortalityChildEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornRwandaSenegalSocioeconomic FactorsContextEquityFacility-based deliveryImplementation scienceStrategies

Identifiers

PMID38413911
PMCPMC10900542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.