ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024
Effect of age and gender on ventricular-arterial coupling estimated using a non-invasive technique.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft ventricular-arterial coupling is assessed as the ratio of left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) to arterial elastance (Ea). Previous studies have introduced non-invasive estimations of Ees/Ea. It requires only four variables, namely pre-ejection period, ejection time, end-systolic pressure and diastolic pressure. The aims of the present study were to clarify the reference values of Ees/Ea estimated using the noninvasive technique, and to investigate the effects of age and gender on Ees/Ea in healthy subjects.
methodsThis retrospective study utilized data from healthy, 30-79-year-old subjects. We recorded electrocardiogram, phonocardiogram, and brachial arterial pulse waves simultaneously using the vascular screening system, and used the observed variables to calculate Ees/Ea. We separated subjects into five groups according to their age and compared Ees/Ea among the different age groups.
resultsThe study included 2114 males and 2292 females. Ees/Ea ranged from 1.87 to 2.04 in males, and 1.98 to 2.32 in females. We observed no age-related differences in Ees/Ea in males (p = 0.10), and significant differences in females (p < 0.001). Ees/Ea in males was not different compared to those in females in 60-69-year-old group (p = 0.92). Whereas Ees/Ea was higher in females compared to those in males in the other age groups. The differences between medians of Ees/Ea in males and those in females were 0.45 (p < 0.001), 0.24 (p < 0.001), 0.13 (p = 0.01), and 0.13 (p = 0.03) in 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 70-79-year-old age groups, respectively.
conclusionsWe clarified the reference values of Ees/Ea in healthy subjects. The effect of age on Ees/Ea is different in males and females, although Ees/Ea is maintained within a relatively narrow range in all subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.