Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413892›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2024

Integrated Management of Childhood Illness implementation in Nepal: understanding strategies, context, and outcomes.

Raj Kumar Subedi, Amelia VanderZanden, Kriti Adhikari, Sasmrita Bastola, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Agnes Binagwaho, Mahesh Maskey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Raj Kumar SubediNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal. rajkumarsubedi@gmail.com.
Amelia VanderZandenUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6984-2132
Kriti AdhikariNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sasmrita BastolaNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Lisa R HirschhornUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.
Agnes BinagwahoUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.
Mahesh MaskeyNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
University of Global Health Equity · RWNLR Nepal · NPNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1191491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth system-delivered evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are important to reducing amenable under-5 mortality (U5M). Implementation research (IR) can reduce knowledge gaps and decrease lags between new knowledge and its implementation in real world settings. IR can also help understand contextual factors and strategies useful to adapting EBIs and their implementation to local settings. Nepal has been a leader in dropping U5M including through adopting EBIs such as integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI). We use IR to identify strategies used in Nepal's adaptation and implementation of IMCI.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods case study using an implementation research framework developed to understand how Nepal outperformed its peers between 2000-2015 in implementing health system-delivered EBIs known to reduce amenable U5M. We combined review of existing literature and data supplemented by 21 key informant interviews with policymakers and implementers, to understand implementation strategies and contextual factors that affected implementation outcomes. We extracted relevant results from the case study and used explanatory mixed methods to understand how and why Nepal had successes and challenges in adapting and implementing one EBI, IMCI.

resultsStrategies chosen and adapted to meet Nepal's specific context included leveraging local research to inform national decision-makers, pilot testing, partner engagement, and building on and integrating with the existing community health system. These cross-cutting strategies benefited from facilitating factors included community health system and structure, culture of data use, and local research capacity. Geography was a critical barrier and while substantial drops in U5M were seen in both the highest and lowest wealth quintiles, with the wealth equity gap decreasing from 73 to 39 per 1,000 live births from 2001 to 2016, substantial geographic inequities remained.

conclusionsNepal's story shows that implementation strategies that are available across contexts were key to adopting and adapting IMCI and achieving outcomes including acceptability, effectiveness, and reach. The value of choosing strategies that leverage facilitating factors such as investments in community-based and facility-based approaches as well as addressing barriers such as geography are useful lessons for countries working to accelerate adaptation and implementation of strategies to implement EBIs to continue achieving child health targets.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedChildChild HealthHumansNepalImplementation researchImplementation strategiesIntegrated management of childhood illnessNepalUnder-5 mortality

Identifiers

PMID38413892
PMCPMC10900553
OpenAlexW4392771960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.