Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413851›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

GPAD: a natural language processing-based application to extract the gene-disease association discovery information from OMIM.

K M Tahsin Hassan Rahit, Vladimir Avramovic, Jessica X Chong, Maja Tarailo-Graovac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Considerations for reporting variants in novel candidate genes identified during clinical genomic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K M Tahsin Hassan RahitDepartments of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Medical Genetics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Vladimir AvramovicDepartments of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Medical Genetics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Jessica X ChongDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Maja Tarailo-GraovacDepartments of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Medical Genetics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada. maja.tarailograovac@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

University of Washington Mendelian Genomics Research Center (UW-MGRC)U01HG011744 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MICHAEL Joseph BAMSHAD, Evan Eichler · 2021 to 2026
$15.8M
A next-generation morbid map of the human genomeR35HG011297 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CHONG, JESSICA XIAO-LING · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
CIHR GP1-155868NHGRI NIH HHS R35 HG011297NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG011744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThousands of genes have been associated with different Mendelian conditions. One of the valuable sources to track these gene-disease associations (GDAs) is the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database. However, most of the information in OMIM is textual, and heterogeneous (e.g. summarized by different experts), which complicates automated reading and understanding of the data. Here, we used Natural Language Processing (NLP) to make a tool (Gene-Phenotype Association Discovery (GPAD)) that could syntactically process OMIM text and extract the data of interest.

resultsGPAD applies a series of language-based techniques to the text obtained from OMIM API to extract GDA discovery-related information. GPAD can inform when a particular gene was associated with a specific phenotype, as well as the type of validation-whether through model organisms or cohort-based patient-matching approaches-for such an association. GPAD extracted data was validated with published reports and was compared with large language model. Utilizing GPAD's extracted data, we analysed trends in GDA discoveries, noting a significant increase in their rate after the introduction of exome sequencing, rising from an average of about 150-250 discoveries each year. Contrary to hopes of resolving most GDAs for Mendelian disorders by now, our data indicate a substantial decline in discovery rates over the past five years (2017-2022). This decline appears to be linked to the increasing necessity for larger cohorts to substantiate GDAs. The rising use of zebrafish and Drosophila as model organisms in providing evidential support for GDAs is also observed.

conclusionsGPAD's real-time analyzing capacity offers an up-to-date view of GDA discovery and could help in planning and managing the research strategies. In future, this solution can be extended or modified to capture other information in OMIM and scientific literature.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingZebrafishAnimalsDatabases, GeneticForecastingHumansPhenotypeGene discoveryGene-disease relationshipMendelian disorderNLPRare disease geneTrends in gene discovery

Identifiers

PMID38413851
PMCPMC10898068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.