Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413786›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Revolutionizing core muscle analysis in female sexual dysfunction based on machine learning.

Doaa A Abdel Hady, Tarek Abd El-Hafeez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
20.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Classification of psychosis spectrum disorders using graph convolutional networks with structurally constrained functional connectomes.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Doaa A Abdel HadyDepartment of Physical Therapy for Women's Health, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Deraya University, EL-Minia, Egypt. doaa.abdelnaser@deraya.edu.eg.
Tarek Abd El-HafeezDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Minia University, EL-Minia, Egypt. tarek@mu.edu.eg.
Minia University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of core muscles in female sexual dysfunction (FSD) and develop comprehensive rehabilitation programs to address this issue. We aim to answer the following research questions: what are the roles of core muscles in FSD, and how can machine and deep learning models accurately predict changes in core muscles during FSD? FSD is a common condition that affects women of all ages, characterized by symptoms such as decreased libido, difficulty achieving orgasm, and pain during intercourse. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of changes in core muscles during FSD using machine and deep learning. We evaluated the performance of multiple models, including multi-layer perceptron (MLP), long short-term memory (LSTM), convolutional neural network (CNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), ElasticNetCV, random forest regressor, SVR, and Bagging regressor. The models were evaluated based on mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and R-squared (R

Indexed as

Sexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMachine LearningMusclesQuality of LifeCore muscle analysisDeep learningFemale sexual dysfunctionMachine learningRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38413786
PMCPMC10899583
OpenAlexW4392200867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.