Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413684›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Virtual non-iodine photon-counting CT-angiography for aortic valve calcification scoring.

Philipp Feldle, Marit Scheuber, Jan-Peter Grunz, Julius F Heidenreich, Pauline Pannenbecker, Conrads Nora, Henner Huflage, Thorsten A Bley, Bernhard Petritsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A scoping review of photon-counting detector computed tomography in cardiovascular imaging.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philipp FeldleDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. feldle_p@ukw.de.
Marit ScheuberDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Jan-Peter GrunzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Julius F HeidenreichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Pauline PannenbeckerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Conrads NoraDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Henner HuflageDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Thorsten A BleyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Bernhard PetritschDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Feschnigstr. 11, 9020, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEKlinikum Klagenfurt · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT allows for reconstruction of virtual non-iodine (VNI) images from contrast-enhanced datasets. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of aortic valve calcification scoring (AVCS) derived from VNI datasets generated with a 1st generation clinical dual-source PCD-CT. AVCS was evaluated in 123 patients (statistical analysis only comprising patients with aortic valve calcifications [n = 56; 63.2 ± 11.6 years]), who underwent contrast enhanced electrocardiogram-gated (either prospective or retrospective or both) cardiac CT on a clinical PCD system. Patient data was reconstructed at 70 keV employing a VNI reconstruction algorithm. True non-contrast (TNC) scans at 70 keV without quantum iterative reconstruction served as reference in all individuals. Subgroup analysis was performed in 17 patients who received both, prospectively and retrospectively gated contrast enhanced scans (n = 8 with aortic valve calcifications). VNI images with prospective/retrospective gating had an overall sensitivity of 69.2%/56.0%, specificity of 100%/100%, accuracy of 85.4%/81.0%, positive predictive value of 100%/100%, and a negative predictive value of 78.2%/75.0%. VNI images with retrospective gating achieved similar results. For both gating approaches, AVCS

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCalcinosisIodineAngiographyHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedIodine

Identifiers

PMID38413684
PMCPMC10899655
OpenAlexW4392193697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.