Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413654›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Design and preliminary validation of a high-fidelity vascular simulator for robot-assisted manipulation.

Giulia Gamberini, Sabina Maglio, Andrea Mariani, Alessandro Dario Mazzotta, Antonello Forgione, Jacques Marescaux, Franca Melfi, Selene Tognarelli, Arianna Menciassi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Giulia GamberiniHealth Science Interdisciplinary Center, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy. giulia.gamberini@santannapisa.it.ORCID 0009-0005-9311-2910
Sabina MaglioThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera (Pisa), Italy.
Andrea MarianiHealth Science Interdisciplinary Center, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro Dario MazzottaThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera (Pisa), Italy.
Antonello ForgioneIRCAD France, Institut de recherche contre les cancers de l'appareil digestif, Strabourg Cedex, France.
Jacques MarescauxIRCAD France, Institut de recherche contre les cancers de l'appareil digestif, Strabourg Cedex, France.
Franca MelfiUniversity of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Selene TognarelliThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera (Pisa), Italy.
Arianna MenciassiHealth Science Interdisciplinary Center, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITInstitut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif · FRUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgeries is increasing annually, together with the need for dedicated and effective training. Surgeons need to learn how to address the novel control modalities of surgical instruments and the loss of haptic feedback, which is a common feature of most surgical robots. High-fidelity physical simulation has proved to be a valid training tool, and it might help in fulfilling these learning needs. In this regard, a high-fidelity sensorized simulator of vascular structures was designed, fabricated and preliminarily validated. The main objective of the simulator is to train novices in robotic surgery to correctly perform vascular resection procedures without applying excessive strain to tissues. The vessel simulator was integrated with soft strain sensors to quantify and objectively assess manipulation skills and to provide real-time feedback to the trainee during a training session. Additionally, a portable and user-friendly training task board was produced to replicate anatomical constraints. The simulator was characterized in terms of its mechanical properties, demonstrating its realism with respect to human tissues. Its face, content and construct validity, together with its usability, were assessed by implementing a training scenario with 13 clinicians, and the results were generally positive.

Indexed as

RoboticsClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationFeedbackHumansLearningPhysical Examination

Identifiers

PMID38413654
PMCPMC10899586
OpenAlexW4392190512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.