Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413589›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

TopBP1 utilises a bipartite GINS binding mode to support genome replication.

Matthew Day, Bilal Tetik, Milena Parlak, Yasser Almeida-Hernández, Markus Räschle, Farnusch Kaschani, Heike Siegert, Anika Marko, Elsa Sanchez-Garcia, Markus Kaiser and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. TRMT6-directed mNPJ precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew Day *School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, UK. matthew.day@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7218-867X
Bilal Tetik *Molecular Genetics II, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 2-5, 45141, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-8492-6071
Milena Parlak *Molecular Genetics II, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 2-5, 45141, Essen, Germany.
Yasser Almeida-HernándezComputational Bioengineering, Fakultät Bio- und Chemieingenieurwesen, Technical University Dortmund, Emil-Figge Str. 66, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9832-3534
Markus RäschleMolecular Genetics, Technical University Kaiserslautern, Paul-Ehrlich Straße 24, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6737-7203
Farnusch KaschaniAnalytics Core Facility Essen, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 2-5, 45141, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6572-3232
Heike SiegertMolecular Genetics II, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 2-5, 45141, Essen, Germany.
Anika MarkoMolecular Genetics II, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 2-5, 45141, Essen, Germany.
Elsa Sanchez-GarciaComputational Bioengineering, Fakultät Bio- und Chemieingenieurwesen, Technical University Dortmund, Emil-Figge Str. 66, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.
Markus KaiserAnalytics Core Facility Essen, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 2-5, 45141, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6540-8520
Isabel A BarkerCancer Research UK DNA Repair Enzymes Group, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK.
Laurence H PearlCancer Research UK DNA Repair Enzymes Group, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK. Laurence.Pearl@sussex.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6910-1809
Antony W OliverCancer Research UK DNA Repair Enzymes Group, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK. Antony.Oliver@sussex.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2912-8273
Dominik BoosMolecular Genetics II, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 2-5, 45141, Essen, Germany. dominik.boos@uni-due.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0018-4375
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Sussex · GBTU Dortmund University · DEInstitute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity of Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C302/A14532Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C302/A24386Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) EXC-390677874-RESOLVDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) FOR2800Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) INST 20876/322-1 FUGGDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) INST - 436586093Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) RTG1739Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) SFB1430; 424228829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of the replicative Mcm2-7 helicase by loading GINS and Cdc45 is crucial for replication origin firing, and as such for faithful genetic inheritance. Our biochemical and structural studies demonstrate that the helicase activator GINS interacts with TopBP1 through two separate binding surfaces, the first involving a stretch of highly conserved amino acids in the TopBP1-GINI region, the second a surface on TopBP1-BRCT4. The two surfaces bind to opposite ends of the A domain of the GINS subunit Psf1. Mutation analysis reveals that either surface is individually able to support TopBP1-GINS interaction, albeit with reduced affinity. Consistently, either surface is sufficient for replication origin firing in Xenopus egg extracts and becomes essential in the absence of the other. The TopBP1-GINS interaction appears sterically incompatible with simultaneous binding of DNA polymerase epsilon (Polε) to GINS when bound to Mcm2-7-Cdc45, although TopBP1-BRCT4 and the Polε subunit PolE2 show only partial competitivity in binding to Psf1. Our TopBP1-GINS model improves the understanding of the recently characterised metazoan pre-loading complex. It further predicts the coordination of three molecular origin firing processes, DNA polymerase epsilon arrival, TopBP1 ejection and GINS integration into Mcm2-7-Cdc45.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA Polymerase IIMinichromosome Maintenance ProteinsVirus ReplicationCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase IIMinichromosome Maintenance Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38413589
PMCPMC10899662
OpenAlexW4392188484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.