ArticleThe AAPS journal2024
The Role of Model Master Files for Sharing, Acceptance, and Communication with FDA.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model Master File Framework: A Regulatory Path Advancing Modeling and Simulation Applications.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Best Practices in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Review
- Concentration-dependent blood binding: assessing implications through physiologically based Pharmacokinetic modeling of tacrolimus as a case example.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025Article
- Development of a Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Model Report Template: Considerations for Improved Quality in View of Regulatory Submissions.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Immunogenicity of Generic Peptide Impurities: Current Orthogonal Approaches.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Leveraging Model Master Files for Long-Acting Injectables.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Regulatory and Industry Perspective on the Model Master File Framework for Locally Acting Drug Products.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Considerations for Regulatory Reusability of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Development.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Considering Opportunities and Challenges When Implementing the Model Master File Framework - a Meeting Report.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Leveraging Model Master Files from a Technology Company Perspective: Facilitating Quantitative Medicine in Regulatory Frameworks.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Paving the Path for Increased Technological Innovation, Strategic Decision Making and Regulatory Acceptance of Modeling and Simulation Approaches.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Using Model Master Files to Support Oral Drug Product Development and Regulatory Submissions.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Adopting the Model Master File Framework to Enhance Modeling and Simulations Approaches for Regulatory Use.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Review
- PBBM Considerations for Base Models, Model Validation, and Application Steps: Workshop Summary Report.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Application of Advanced Modeling Approaches Supporting Generic Product Development Under GDUFA for Fiscal Year 2023.The AAPS journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the evolving role of Model Integrated Evidence (MIE) in generic drug development and regulatory applications, the need for improving Model Sharing, Acceptance, and Communication with the FDA is warranted. Model Master File (MMF) refers to a quantitative model or a modeling platform that has undergone sufficient model Verification & Validation to be recognized as sharable intellectual property that is acceptable for regulatory purposes. MMF provides a framework for regulatorily acceptable modeling practice, which can be used with confidence to support MIE by both the industry and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In 2022, the FDA and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) hosted a virtual public workshop to discuss the best practices for utilizing modeling approaches to support generic product development. This report summarizes the presentations and panel discussions of the workshop symposium entitled "Model Sharing, Acceptance, and Communication with the FDA". The symposium and this report serve as a kick-off discussion for further utilities of MMF and best practices of utilizing MMF in drug development and regulatory submissions. The potential advantages of MMFs have garnered acknowledgment from model developers, industries, and the FDA throughout the workshop. To foster a unified comprehension of MMFs and establish best practices for their application, further dialogue and cooperation among stakeholders are imperative. To this end, a subsequent workshop is scheduled for May 2-3, 2024, in Rockville, Maryland, aiming to delve into the practical facets and best practices of MMFs pertinent to regulatory submissions involving modeling and simulation methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38413548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.