Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413542›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

The stress for surgeons: exploring stress entities with the robotic senhance surgical system.

Vivianda Menke, Olaf Hansen, Johannes Schmidt, Georg Dechantsreiter, Ludger Staib, Mukhammad Davliatov, Florian Schilcher, Bodo Hübner, Francesco Bianco, Zeljko Kastelan and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Children Using the SenhanceChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Vivianda MenkeDepartment of Surgery, Evangelisches Hospital Wesel, Wesel, Germany. Vivianda.Menke@evkwesel.de.
Olaf HansenDepartment of Surgery, Evangelisches Hospital Wesel, Wesel, Germany.
Johannes SchmidtDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Landshut-Achdorf, Landshut, Germany.
Georg DechantsreiterDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Landshut-Achdorf, Landshut, Germany.
Ludger StaibDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.
Mukhammad DavliatovDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.
Florian SchilcherDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.
Bodo HübnerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.
Francesco BiancoDepartment of Surgery, General, Minimally Invasive & Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Zeljko KastelanDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomislav KulisDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tvrtko HudolinDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Luka PenezicDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Toni ZekulicDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Jerko AndelicDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ilija JuricDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivan PudaDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Raimondas SiaulysDepartment of Surgery, Urology and Gynaecology, Klaipeda University Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania.
Raimundas VenckusDepartment of Surgery, Urology and Gynaecology, Klaipeda University Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania.
Marius JasenusDepartment of Surgery, Urology and Gynaecology, Klaipeda University Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania.
Vitalijus EismontasDepartment of Surgery, Urology and Gynaecology, Klaipeda University Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania.
Narimantas Evaldas SamalaviciusDepartment of Surgery, Urology and Gynaecology, Klaipeda University Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic surgery is on its way to revolutionizing traditional surgical procedures, offering precise and minimally invasive techniques hypothesized to shorten recovery times and improve patient outcomes. While there have been multiple publications on robotic systems' medical and procedural achievements, more emphasis should be put on the surgeon's experience, especially in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. The present report aims to systematically examine the stress impact on surgeons by comparing the robotic Senhance Surgical System (Asensus Surgical, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A) to laparoscopic surgery. The well-established "SURG-TLX" survey is used to measure distinct stress entities. The "SURG-TLX" survey is a modified version of the NASA-TLX, validated for surgery by M. Willson. Based on a comprehensive database from six centers encompassing various disciplines and surgical procedures, our analysis indicates significantly reduced "overall stress" levels for robotic (cockpit) compared to laparoscopic surgeons. Exploring the "SURG-TLX" stress dimensions further between methods (robotic vs. laparoscopic) and surgeon position (laparoscopic, (robotic) bedside, or (robotic) cockpit) resulted in significantly more Mental (p.value < 0.015), less Physical Demands (p.value < 0.001) and less Distraction (p.value < 0.009) for robotic surgery, especially regarding the robotic cockpit surgeons. This finding suggests that robotic surgery with the Senhance Surgical System contributes to a favorable stress profile for surgeons, potentially enhancing their overall well-being and performance.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAugmented intelligenceRobotic gynaecologyRobotic surgeryRobotic urologyStressSurg TLX

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.