Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413510›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024

Subjective and objective image quality of low-dose CT images processed using a self-supervised denoising algorithm.

Yuya Kimura, Takeru Q Suyama, Yasuteru Shimamura, Jun Suzuki, Masato Watanabe, Hiroshi Igei, Yuya Otera, Takayuki Kaneko, Maho Suzukawa, Hirotoshi Matsui and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuya KimuraClinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Tokyo National Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. yuk.close.to.wrd.34@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1649-0596
Takeru Q SuyamaNadogaya Research Institute, Nadogaya Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yasuteru ShimamuraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Kasumi Clinic, Hiroshima, Japan.
Jun SuzukiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masato WatanabeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi IgeiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuya OteraDepartment of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki KanekoRadiological Physics and Technology Department, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Maho SuzukawaClinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Tokyo National Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirotoshi MatsuiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki KudoInstitute of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the subjective and objective image quality of low-dose computed tomography (CT) images processed using a self-supervised denoising algorithm with deep learning. We trained the self-supervised denoising model using low-dose CT images of 40 patients and applied this model to CT images of another 30 patients. Image quality, in terms of noise and edge sharpness, was rated on a 5-point scale by two radiologists. The coefficient of variation, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were calculated. The values for the self-supervised denoising model were compared with those for the original low-dose CT images and CT images processed using other conventional denoising algorithms (non-local means, block-matching and 3D filtering, and total variation minimization-based algorithms). The mean (standard deviation) scores of local and overall noise levels for the self-supervised denoising algorithm were 3.90 (0.40) and 3.93 (0.51), respectively, outperforming the original image and other algorithms. Similarly, the mean scores of local and overall edge sharpness for the self-supervised denoising algorithm were 3.90 (0.40) and 3.75 (0.47), respectively, surpassing the scores of the original image and other algorithms. The CNR and SNR for the self-supervised denoising algorithm were higher than those for the original images but slightly lower than those for the other algorithms. Our findings indicate the potential clinical applicability of the self-supervised denoising algorithm for low-dose CT images in clinical settings.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiation DosageSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedArtificial intelligenceDeep learningLow-dose X-ray computed tomographySelf-supervised denoising algorithm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.