Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413505›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2024

The time course of the spatial representation of 'past' and 'future' concepts: New evidence from the STEARC effect.

Gabriele Scozia, Mario Pinto, Silvana Lozito, Nicola Binetti, Mariella Pazzaglia, Stefano Lasaponara, Fabrizio Doricchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Spatial Representation of Self-Referential Negative Events.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabriele Scozia *Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Roma, Italy.
Mario Pinto *Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Roma, Italy.
Silvana LozitoDipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Roma, Italy.
Nicola BinettiInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.
Mariella PazzagliaDipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Roma, Italy.
Stefano LasaponaraDipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Roma, Italy.
Fabrizio DoricchiDipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Roma, Italy. fabrizio.doricchi@uniroma1.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans use space to think of and communicate the flow of time. This spatial representation of time is influenced by cultural habits so that in left-to-right reading cultures, short durations and past events are mentally positioned to the left of long durations and future events. The STEARC effect (Space Temporal Association of Response Codes) shows a faster classification of short durations/past events with responses on the left side of space and of long durations/future events with responses on the right side. We have recently showed that during the classification of time durations, space is a late heuristic of time because in this case, the STEARC appears only when manual responses are slow, not when they are fast. Here, we wished to extend this observation to the semantic classification of words as referring to the 'past' or the 'future'. We hypothesised that the semantic processing of 'past' and 'future' concepts would have engaged slower decision processes than the classification of short versus long time durations. According to dual-route models of conflict tasks, if the task-dependent classification/decision process were to proceed relatively slowly, then the effects of direct activation of culturally preferred links between stimulus and response (S-R), i.e., past/left and future/right in the case of the present task, should attain higher amplitudes before the instruction-dependent correct response is selected. This would imply that, at variance with the faster classification of time durations, during the slower semantic classification of time concepts, in incongruent trials, the direct activation of culturally preferred S-R links should introduce significant reaction time (RT) costs and a corresponding STEARC at the fastest manual responses in the experiment too. The study's results confirmed this hypothesis and showed that in the classification of temporal words, the STEARC also increased as a function of the length of RTs. Taken together, the results from sensory duration and semantic classification STEARC tasks show that the occurrence, strength and time course of the STEARC varies significantly as a function of the speed and level of cognitive processing required in the task.

Indexed as

Reaction TimeSemanticsSpace PerceptionTime PerceptionAdultAttentionDecision MakingFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleOrientationPattern Recognition, VisualReadingYoung AdultMental time lineSpace-time associationSTEARC effectTime

Identifiers

PMID38413505
PMCPMC11062999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.